[QUOTE="VauxhalI"]
[QUOTE="OwnallConsoles"]
I will explain what I mean further.
I played Zelda TP and was bored of it. It seems like I played the whole game before in Oot. I did not enjoy the wolf aspects and the game seemed like a total rehash. This looks to be similiar.
kontejner44
You like Grand Theft Auto, though. Right? That formula really hasn't changed much since GTA3, do you complain about that as well? I hope you're consistent.
This can be applied to most of the PS360 games anyway, including most "new IPs" because they contain the same gameplay seen in other games, what's the point? RDR you say? It's GTA4: Horse Edition.
Skyward Sword is actually a huge gameplay step forward thanks to WM+ we now have strategic combat
I'm curious to know what exactly "has remain unchanged since OoT" in Zelda games? And what do you propose as an alternative? People who have complaints are more like haters rather than giving constructive criticism, which is why people have to respond with hate
There is a reason why Nintendo choosed to add motion / IR / touch screen on their systems, it adds the potential of new gameplay. If you want something new and unique, Nintendo is the only company devoted to deliver just that.
OwnAll dude is most likely biased against moving, and no they aren't going to add traditional controls as the combat is impossible to emulate with dual analogue controls. It seems to me like you are afraid of new, as you are craving for a tradtional control setup, which is a step back at this point.
I agree with you, and I wasn't bashing Skyward Sword. I think it's going to be a good game. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy that a lot of gamespoters subscribe to. "It's not different enough!" - people that %i&*H about that, I hope, aren't playing Modern Warfare and several other this gen shooters. Why? Because they're all the same. But most of them probably do, and it's laughable when they use arguments against a popular series that pretty much apply to every game they play as well.
Log in to comment