Vicious_T's forum posts
With only 20 gb HD, component cables (this is pathetic if you have HDTV with hdmi), wireless controller (Is that a joke) thats it? I don't see where the extra $100 comes from. And we all know the X360 core system is a joke in itself.
For all who don't believe me..well getting girls is the norm for me. The hard part is keeping them long enough. I knew most of you guys have no experience with girls....hence you all relate yourself to me..if its impossible for me to get a girl..it has to be impossible for someone else too..right :P
[QUOTE="Vicious_T"]Its true. When women come over to my apartment I quickly hid my X360. Once they see my PS3 in all its shiny goodness.."they think this guy has money, style, smarts" and they always want to try bluray movies. I comment saying bluray is the future. X360 on the otherhand is like a gaming machine only...and when girls see the white out of place box..well their attitude changes from cool guy to.."you play videogames?"yuck I dont date loser gamers. So in fact I do hide my X360 and GCN when company comes over.dgsagThat wasn't funny... What kind of guy would go showing off his ps3 to girls in the first place? :?
Well when it sits under my 1080p 40 incher its hard to miss.
[QUOTE="Vicious_T"][QUOTE="ps3gen"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="ps3gen"][QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]Here's a game that looks better than Gears...I'll remind you it's on the 360 and is in-game
BATTLEFIELD: BAD COMPANY
That game looks amazing. And it's filled with a fully destructable environment. It's great.
gnutux
Another FPS game for the 360 why im i not surprise
Got nothing to say about the graphics eh? Losing faith in your argument already? :wink:
what grahics?? why is lemming so into graphics? if you think graphics makes the game play better then you are mistaken.. and If you think PS3 cant do that then your completly lost touch of reality..and i can care less about the pictures he posted ..its just another fps..yay im thrill!!:roll:
Reality is I can guarantee once the game releases it will not look like those shots. Its just a fact proven over an over again. Unless of course its PC game.
Gears of War looked just like it promised, the graphics was never downgraded. gnutuxI dream too.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="ps3gen"][QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]Here's a game that looks better than Gears...I'll remind you it's on the 360 and is in-game
BATTLEFIELD: BAD COMPANY
That game looks amazing. And it's filled with a fully destructable environment. It's great.
ps3gen
Another FPS game for the 360 why im i not surprise
Got nothing to say about the graphics eh? Losing faith in your argument already? :wink:
what grahics?? why is lemming so into graphics? if you think graphics makes the game play better then you are mistaken.. and If you think PS3 cant do that then your completly lost touch of reality..and i can care less about the pictures he posted ..its just another fps..yay im thrill!!:roll:
Reality is I can guarantee once the game releases it will not look like those shots. Its just a fact proven over an over again. Unless of course its PC game.
[QUOTE="Vicious_T"]Gears of War is like Halo for Xbox. The Halo sequal look the same and was hardly a jump in graphics at all.
The_Daw
![](http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/6640/1129612448halo1fr8.jpg)
![](http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/1051/halo2192194752mwe6.jpg)
I'd say there was a bit of a leap at least
Those in-game shots are so cool.:lol:
[QUOTE="Vicious_T"][QUOTE="Elementguy13"][QUOTE="Vicious_T"]Why wouldnt they dissapear, by the end of a 10 round match their would be 50 corpses everywhere, that makes sense.Gears of War is like Halo for Xbox. The Halo sequal look the same and was hardly a jump in graphics at all.
Considering that X360 is suppose to be easy to program for..its a give Epic already push X360 to its limits. It makes sense cause in Gears of War, the textures are of low resolutions and the enemy bodies disappear into a blood splot. That just shows that X360 doesnt have the power to handle such extra features like higher textures and dont have adequate memory for retaining enemy corpses.
I dont expect Gears of War 2 to be a graphical leap at all..but it will be better in a sense the dev will have more time with story, and design better levels than what was in Gears of War. Now its time to milk the franchise just like Halo did it Xbox.
DSgamer64
In single player? In the game there like 4 enemies at a time. And they cant keep 4 dead corpses. RFOM had 10-20 enemies at times and corpses remain.
So, who really cares, dead corpses just take more power out of the systems overall quality for graphics which can be better spent on the environment and enemies in general. Look at Prince of Persia for example, great looking environments last gen and when you killed enemies they turned into sand, that takes less rendering then keeping corpses on the ground. In UT2004 enemies disappeared in some shape or form, depending on how you killed them. If you fry em with a laser weapon the just vanish, blast em with a rocket and their body blows into a number of pieces and eventually vanishes. Half the time they just drop dead though. When you are playing a 32 player match, having corpses everywhere really puts more pressure on graphics cards and can create slow downs over time.
Dead corpses is what makes fps fun IMO. Whats the point of wreaking havoc in an area when you can't walk back and see the spoils you've caused. :? Wolfenstein and Doom 2 be rather dull without them.
Log in to comment