[QUOTE="Why_Me-"][QUOTE="CptJSparrow"][QUOTE="Why_Me-"]I'm against moral anarchy, because history has proven that anarchy only leads to social collapse and madness.

There are morals, and rights and wrongs in the world. Abortion should only be used an a necessary evil in the case of a rape, ect. A wrong that erases another wrong.

This opinion isn't formulated based on any religion, as I'm primarily non-religious myself. It is formulated through a realist's world view.

CptJSparrow

What I'm saying, is that under a system of moral anarchy, you may have fun for a while, but a society will not survive for very long-- like a degenerate child that wasraised without parental guidance. Countries are only as good as the people that inhabit them, and if the people are all guideless, the country is guideless.

Why do you think that I personally oppose abortion? Because I believe that anyone who has an abortion has convinced themselves that they are the center of the universe. A country where the people only care about themselves, and nothing else would be something that presumably you would oppose, but that is where this road is taking us.

[QUOTE="Why_Me-"]I'm against shortcuts, and easy ways out.guitboxdude25

do you know what happens to a mother after she gets an abortion?yep deff is the easy way out :roll:

Your argument appears to be that abortion is not an easy way out, but in reality, it is. The only problem is, after the mother has an abortion and takes the easy way out, she later is emotionally affected, and wants an easy way to undo the abortion. That is an impossibility.

Is it not feasable that one who takes one easy way out, eventually wants another?

[QUOTE="Why_Me-"]I'm against moral anarchy, because history has proven that anarchy only leads to social collapse and madness.

There are morals, and rights and wrongs in the world. Abortion should only be used an a necessary evil in the case of a rape, ect. A wrong that erases another wrong.

This opinion isn't formulated based on any religion, as I'm primarily non-religious myself. It is formulated through a realist's world view.

CptJSparrow

What I'm saying, is that under a system of moral anarchy, you may have fun for a while, but a society will not survive for very long-- like a degenerate child that wasraised without parental guidance. Countries are only as good as the people that inhabit them, and if the people are all guideless, the country is guideless.

[QUOTE="Why_Me-"]

I'm against moral anarchy, because history has proven that anarchy only leads to social collapse and madness.

There are morals, and rights and wrongs in the world. Abortion should only be used an a necessary evil in the case of a rape, ect. A wrong that erases another wrong.

This opinion isn't formulated based on any religion, as I'm primarily non-religious myself. It is formulated through a realist's world view.

Master_Sword91

We probably agree on whether or not abotion should be legal, we only disagree with the exceptions, and you aren't going to change my mind.

[QUOTE="deshields538"]No it doesn't. The law in my country states that the only way an abortion can happen is if it threatens the mothers life. foxhound_fox

There are morals, and rights and wrongs in the world. Abortion should only be used as a necessary evil in the case of a rape, ect. A wrong that erases another wrong.

This opinion isn't formulated based on any religion, as I'm primarily non-religious myself. It is formulated through a realist's world view.

Your proof better be good-- like you invented a time machine and went into the future..

Nope, I just read your post... no proof!

PS: How much of the 360's population will be too busy playing Halo 3 online to care about any of the above games? I'm guessing 85%.

How do you define what is the best?

Best in terms of what? PS3 is the most reliable of the next gen consoles, and the 360 as of now, has the best games. My PS3 works fine, but I never play it. My 360 is being shipped to Microsoft for repairs, and I wish I had it.