You should read the review and use the critisism to way off whether or not the game is for you. If the critisism on that particular game doesn't apply to you; for example: there is no multiplayer. If you don't care about multiplayer this wouldn't matter to you; then you can just buy the game regardless of it's critisism and/or score.

But when reviewers get fired because they flopped a game that they were apperently paid for to give an almighty review, then no. You can't trust it. Which is what is happening on Gamespot. At least, as far as we've been told.

There is no way the next generation is already going to take advantage of 3D technology. The next generation will be more powerful and with even more connectivity to internet downloads. I really don't see them adding 3D technology to it, as it's way too expensive for most people. Looking at how the Wii is doing, it's pretty clear cheap little machines are much more wanted then expensive consoles. How many people would buy a 3D empowered console? Not much, I'll tell you that.

Whoever is foolish enough to already take this step next generation, will be dead last on the sales charts.

Yeah. The reviewer said you couldn't shoot up or down in the Mako. Which, you very much can. So I don't know how much he played the game and I know it's just one person's view on the game, but seriously, he just lied in the review. Because you can shoot up or down in the Mako. So I don't know that that was about.

Also, the interface seems very accurate to me. I don't know what the problem is. And this game didn't get any graphical medal? Don't know what's up but this is one review you might want to consider un-accurate. Maybe Bioware didn't pay Gamespot so they deducted the score for that.