Wickerman777's forum posts

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@kod said:
@Wickerman777 said:

Europe has only a few decades left.

This is a hilariously stupid comment.

And your comment is pathetically naive. Once the Muslims have sufficient numbers on European soil they're gonna start slaughtering anyone that disagrees with them like cattle. GUARANTEED. Ignore reality if you want to, doesn't matter to me.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Because they'd rather appear virtuous than be alive. Europe has only a few decades left. Hopefully America will last longer as we get our immigration from all over the world rather than almost entirely Muslims from Africa and Asia. But even this country's days are numbered. The west is over. Everything ends. Rome fell too. We ain't having kids no more and everybody else is breeding like insects. Add on top of that our inability to say no cuz "feelings." Just a matter of time.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@JimB said:
@jackburton82 said:

@tryhardtroll: Hillary Clinton would have probably given me more free shit... so thats who i voted for. But Bernie is the man!

That is what is wrong with people like you. Nothing is free someone has to pay for it, and it ends up being the same people who pay for everything else.

So as a Republican you'd rather support big business. Don't give me that shit. I'd rather help disadvantaged people than the wealthy.

What do you mean by disadvantaged? If you mean the working poor I agree with you. If you're talking instead about useless heaps that refuse to work or be responsible for themselves in any way let em starve. The world is now hugely overpopulated and working people get the shaft of having to pay for them because of bleeding hearts always wanting to artificially prop up dead weight and therefor encouraging them to be even more lazy and worthless.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

What I've noticed about MS over the years when it comes to games exclusive to their platform is that their expectations/demands are too high. They want everything to be a megahit on par with Halo. "Oh, you made us a game that scored 80 on metacritic and sold a million copies? Not good enough. We want a 90 and 5 million copies sold or we're severing ties with you." It's just always seemed to me that they give up on IP far too easily. When your philosophy is megahit or bust ya end up without many titles. Think Sony's approach of having many games that achieve moderate success is better. I mean I don't know how profitable that is for Sony but it certainly makes for a much more diverse library for their customers and in the end and taken as a whole that's a win. Still think it's ridiculous that they gave up on Mistwalker so quickly. The two games they made for MS proved they were a talented studio and they were also filling a niche for them. But MS's approach of wanting the moon or nothing at all struck again.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

I don't think most people care about reviews. After all he just admitted that despite the bad reviews the movie made a buttload of money. That kinda defeats his argument in and of itself. As far as RT goes I like it and I agree with their scores far, far more often than I disagree with them.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

It really can't be Jaguar or it will be bottlenecked like crazy. Right away when I heard about PS4 Pro I felt they needed to do something about its CPU, clocking it higher wouldn't be enough. Original PS4 was already bottlenecked so logic dictated upping the GPU but keeping same CPU would lead to even more bottlenecking. And while I don't have PS4 Pro that appears to have become reality cuz what I've seen indicates people are underwhelmed by the machine.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@Jag85 said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

LOL you are no expert in law. Also presidents don't make law to start with.

Oh, but you are, lol.

section 212(f) of the INA

"(f) Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."

An elementary school kid could read that and know what it means ... but apparently you can't, ha ha.

That's the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which was amended by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965:

"No person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence."

What in the high holy hell does issuing visas have to do with anything?!!! The executive order isn't about issuing visas or taking them away! You guys are embarrassing yourselves. Alan Dershowitz is saying the order is legal, the professor of law at Harvard is saying that! Hell, I found out about the provision I listed from watching him talk about it.

That's a huge misrepresentation of what Dershowitz said. He said parts of it are legal and parts of it are illegal, and it's not entirely clear what the order is even saying, because of how poorly worded it is, which would make it very difficult to defend in court. The fact that every federal court has ruled against the order speaks for itself.

Oh christ, saying it's clumsy and politically bad ain't saying it's not legal. He knows it is. Why in the **** weren't you religious nuts (Using that term cuz at this point religion is absolutely what you're exercising) losing your shit like this whenever Obama issued nearly identical orders in 2011 and 2015? This thing is plagiarized from those. But shit, if it really doesn't matter what the law is, if you're just gonna believe whatever you want to I wish Trump would realize that and say "**** it, they're gonna say I'm doing illegal shit even if I ain't so just go ahead and do illegal shit" and go nuts and start issuing some truly good orders like making it legal to run over protesters blocking the road. If that baby gets signed watch his approval rating soar to around 70%.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:
@Jag85 said:

'Violence more common' in Bible than Quran, text analysis reveals

"Of the three texts, the content in the Old Testament appears to be the most violent."

"Killing and destruction are referenced slightly more often in the New Testament (2.8%) than in the Quran (2.1%), but the Old Testament clearly leads—more than twice that of the Quran—in mentions of destruction and killing (5.3%)."

Oh yeah, I see Christians killing Gays, Jews, and calling for the execution of James L. Brooks for making fun of Jesus! You're so full of yourself!

And like I've already said, the average homicide rate of Christian-majority countries is significantly higher than Muslim-majority countries, according to crime statistics from the UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) and WHO (World Health Organization), and a number of academic statistical studies.

I don't doubt that. Punishments are pretty severe in Muslim countries, lol.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

You're going to whine about a list? We're talking NOW about an illegal ban. Didn't your parents teach you that you are responsible for yourself and not to blame others? Seriously that's like kindergarten talk.

Lol, go ahead and exist in your own fantasy world. I just showed a few replies up the page why it isn't illegal. He could have gone way, way further than that and gotten far more specific than that and it still would have been completely legal. You can go ahead and believe it wasn't a nice thing to do, that's open to opinion, but it sure as shit is legal.

LOL you are no expert in law. Also presidents don't make law to start with.

Oh, but you are, lol.

section 212(f) of the INA

"(f) Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."

An elementary school kid could read that and know what it means ... but apparently you can't, ha ha.

That's the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which was amended by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965:

"No person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence."

What in the high holy hell does issuing visas have to do with anything?!!! The executive order isn't about issuing visas or taking them away! You guys are embarrassing yourselves. Alan Dershowitz is saying the order is legal, the professor of law at Harvard is saying that! Hell, I found out about the provision I listed from watching him talk about it. Yet you think you know better? I know that propaganda from leftist pundits has got ya all worked up and they're out there saying all sorts of ridiculous things but that's cuz they don't have anything else they can do. They're saying whatever bullshit they can to win over popular support but legally they don't have a leg to stand on and everyone knows it.