Wickerman777's forum posts

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Toxic-Seahorse said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@Toxic-Seahorse said:
@n64dd said:

Good.

How? How is this good in any way? Do you really support the selective banning of legal immigrants based on nothing in particular? Can you really justify that? It's down right un-American. I didn't think you were just a Trump troll before, but now it seems pretty clear that you are.

Just for the record that was ABSOLUTELY American until 1965 when democrats chose to redefine it.

Ah yes. All those immigrants that helped build our country were already in America, right?

I am simply astonished by how little people know about history but are willing to go on rants anyway, lol. Look up the 1965 immigration act, guy. Until that America took in whites from Europe and there were the blacks from Africa that were enslaved and later freed and that was pretty much it. In fact, there was a period in our history when we were taking in no immigrants whatsoever, not even from Europe, that lasted several decades. You had said we never blocked certain immigrants. WRONG! For a couple hundred years if you weren't white you didn't get in.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Toxic-Seahorse said:
@n64dd said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

And... she loses her job. Fucking typical. How dare anybody criticize "Glorious Leader" Trump.

Good.

How? How is this good in any way? Do you really support the selective banning of legal immigrants based on nothing in particular? Can you really justify that? It's down right un-American. I didn't think you were just a Trump troll before, but now it seems pretty clear that you are.

Just for the record that absolutely was American until it was changed in 1965.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@mark1974 said:

@Wickerman777: I am very worried about the poor people we already have in this country. That is why I support programs for them and an increased minimum wage. Doesn't seems to me like republicans spend much time worrying about the poor in this country or any other.

Lol, I'm telling you about there not being jobs and you want to talk about minimum wage, lol? Dude, I wasn't saying the jobs didn't pay enough, I said they're nonexistent!!! And we ain't seen nothing yet. People are expecting a robotics revolution that will totally transform manufacturing and that's going to be armageddon for these people. It's bad now, catastrophe is just over the horizon.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@mark1974 said:

@Wickerman777: A third is unemployed? I assume you include children and the elderly. There are more reasons to allow refugees into the country than the skills they have that can benefit us. You may not understand them though, they involve apealing to human beings better nature.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/10/21/what-we-know-about-the-92-million-americans-who-arent-in-the-labor-force/

People under 16 aren't included in that. And it was just a quick estimate I threw out there, maybe it's 1/4th. The point is a giant shitton is unemployed and it keeps getting worse. And how do you respond? More virtue signaling, lol. Why is it that for those on the left only those on the other side of the globe matter? Screw the people that are already here. There is an enormous problem at the bottom of the job market in this country. That sector of the economy is disappearing yet we continue to get flooded by new people who know how to do only those sorts of jobs. As people at that skill level see their opportunities disappear they are splitting into groups and becoming increasingly resentful of each other. Ignore it to achieve some sort of a moral superiority if you'd like but it will get worse.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Well, no kidding. It's an Obama appointee.

I guess I won't ever really understand so many passionately applauding more and more unskilled people being brought into this country regardless of where they are from. It at least makes sense if the people have technical/science degrees. But unskilled people? We already have an enormous pool of those people struggling because there is no jobs for them. A third of the American population is unemployed! Many unskilled immigrants are going to have to go straight onto the welfare rolls because in addition to there being no opportunities for them there isn't even for those already here. And the situation is going to get much, much worse as manufacturing gets even more automated than it currently is. For those cheering it on because they think doing so is achieving some sort of moral goal I don't think they understand the monster of a problem they're exasperating.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

It is appearing that it may indeed have been an anti-muslim attack and not two different muslim sects going after each other as also had been speculated.

http://www.businessinsider.com/quebec-mosque-suspect-alexandre-bisonnette-is-an-internet-troll-2017-1

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

So now it's being said that just one of them, Alexandre Bissonnette, was a gunman and the other a witness.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

We've got the names now: Mohamed Khadir and Alexandre Bissonnette.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/at-least-five-killed-in-shooting-at-quebec-city-mosque.html

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@bforrester420 said:
@Wickerman777 said:
@bforrester420 said:

@frank_castle: Oh, yeah...I'm sure they had the courts in mind when that drafted this executive order. Nevermind the fact that Wahabbi clerics in Saudi Arabia, members of the house of Saud sponser terror....and the vast majority of the 9/11 attackers were Saudi...yeah, no, I can see why they're not on the list.

For the 1000th time it's a list that the Obama administration put together.

Why isn't Trump using his own list? It's Trump's list now, Obama is no longer in office in case you haven't noticed. Are Trump supporters already getting out their "Blame Obama" excuses?

If he's trying to make our borders safe, why is he leaving huge, gaping holes?

Lol, like I know. I'm not part of his cabinet dude. Telling you what it is, not why it is. It's funny though that someone complaining about it wants there to be restrictions on even more countries. But anyway, my guess is that the countries picked were because they're highly unstable and/or their governments are considered untrustworthy or uncooperative or whatever. Sure, countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have just as many Islamic extremists but they are stable governments so reliable information can probably be found for people in those countries. But places like Libya and Somalia are complete shitholes that are a chaotic mess. Gonna be harder to obtain reliable info from those places. Don't know if that's the reason but it could be.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@bforrester420 said:

@frank_castle: Oh, yeah...I'm sure they had the courts in mind when that drafted this executive order. Nevermind the fact that Wahabbi clerics in Saudi Arabia, members of the house of Saud sponser terror....and the vast majority of the 9/11 attackers were Saudi...yeah, no, I can see why they're not on the list.

For the 1000th time it's a list that the Obama administration put together.