Wickerman777's forum posts

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Not a global warming denier BUT it is absolutely not a settled issue as some of its proponents like to claim. There are plenty of valid criticisms and unanswered questions out there. Was told for decades by scientists that margarine was better for me than butter then all of a sudden ... oops!

Another thing that bugs me about this subject is that the so-called solutions always suck. They seem to always involve taking money out of one person's pocket and transferring it to someone else's pocket. If it truly is the monumental catastrophe that people claim it is and if you really, really believe it's gonna happen why not propose bigger, bolder, better solutions? Like greening the world's deserts for instance? Oh, but that costs money, doesn't make me any! When scientists decided to wipe out small pox they didn't do it with taxes, lol. Instead they thought big to fix a big problem and succeeded. That those at the top when it comes to proponents of this theory tend to think small instead, think of money collecting, for what is allegedly such a dire situation suggests to me that they aren't as convinced as they claim to be. When these people start talking more about spending money than they do extorting it I might become less suspicious of their motives.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@Serraph105 said:

@Wickerman777: Republicans have the majority of states, and are on the cusp of having not only the senate, House, and executive branch, but also the Supreme Court. Also the rules of redrawing district lines say that it happens every ten years meaning the country is likely to remain in control of conservatives for a decade or more. I hate to say all this of course, but your claim doesn't seem to jive with reality.

I guess you just totally missed the part about 1-2 million 3rd world immigrants arriving in America each and every year? Meaning that unless he puts a stop to it and I doubt he will Trump will have another 4-8 million non-white voters from overseas to deal with in 2020 than he did in 2016. And c'mon, we all know he won this time around because of the white vote. Whites are the shrinking demographic, non-whites the growing one. It ain't something that's just happening, it's by design. Dems are well aware of it and most definitely are not going to give up on identity politics because they're aware of it.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

@Wickerman777: Please, provide evidence of the numbers you just cited.

How the hell can you enter into a political discussion and not know those statistics? How can you even be American and not know those statistics? You living in a cave? What I said was as basic as it gets. And oh, guess I'm the only one that has the internet, eh? Lol. Anyway, since you're too lazy to check yourself this was the very first result I got googling. Ya want to know anything else look yourself! Big internet out there, plenty to read about. :)

http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-Native-Households

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Democratic party is fine. They've engineered demographics in such a way that before long they will be impossible to defeat in national elections. I thought they were probably already there and Hillary apparently thought the same thing hence the reason for her campaign of identity politics and nothing else. But Trump pulled off a fluke. While winning the national popular vote is now nearly impossible for a conservative, and he didn't win it, he did manage to win in exactly the right places for a pretty resounding electoral college victory. But Republicans can't expect to keep pulling that off, especially when the country keeps getting an additional 1-2 million immigrants from 3rd world countries every year, half of whom go directly onto welfare upon arrival and never get off and approximately 80% of whom vote only for democrats to keep both the welfare and more 3rd world immigration coming. Math. As a conservative I'm gonna enjoy this while it's here as I know it's nearly over. Unless 3rd world immigration ceases, and it won't cuz "You're a racsist!!!", conservatism is dead and this is probably its last gasp. Libs are right on the brink of a de facto dictatorship.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@Maroxad said:

Breitbart is so bad, even some right wingers dont like them.

Well, of course. Traditional Republicans are globalists, pro immigration for cheap labor, pro free trade to fatten up investors, etc. Breitbart represents a new kind of conservatism that is less keen on immigration and is more pro worker. Additionally, the old kind is scared shitless of pc dogma and kneels at the altar of it, the new breed fights and attacks it. Gonna be clashes for sure and there has been. But I suspect that seeing that blue wall come crumbling down is going to get some of the traditionalists on-board.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@hillelslovak said:
@Byshop said:
@hillelslovak said:
@Byshop said:

Bitching about things is literally the entire point of Breitbart.

-Byshop

Breitbitch? Bitchbart?

There are conservative news sources and there are liberal news sources, but Breirbart spews a disproportionate amount of hate and doesn't even try to be objective. Their top article right now is about how effective their boycott has been since they announced it. Awesome.

-Byshop

I looked at the site today, what an absurd echo chamber. The mere fact that the site is saying Kelloggs holds 45 million readers in contempt is some high level bitching and moaning.

Yeah, if it was just a page with giant letters saying "Anyone who disagrees with leftist doctrine is a racist, misogynist, xenophobe, fascist, and homophobe!" then it'd be fabulous and highly informative.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@vfighter said:

WFT is breitbart?

I hadn't heard of it either until Clinton started ranting about it. So I checked it out and it is the best conservative news site on the internet. If it sucked the left wouldn't care about it, but it doesn't ... far from it ... and that's why it scares the hell out of them. Best way to describe it is "conservatism with balls". They are totally hostile to the pc crowd (Who soooooo deserve it!) and don't shy away from saying what needs to be said. Thanks for letting me know about it, Hillary. :)

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

And it turns out this "values" based cereal company are purveyors of child slave labor. Pot. Kettle. Black.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@skipper847 said:

There would be a lot of muslims in UK in jail if that was over here. Saw on the news a couple of year back Muslims screaming and cutting up and burning the English flag but demanding more benefits. lol.

Once their numbers are sufficient enough they'll be burning the country down instead. Guaranteed. Muslim immigration = suicide.