Xerlaoth's forum posts

Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
smash bros. brawl, the bigs, and dragon quest: swords
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
Crystal, I found G/S/C to be the most engrossing generation, as you could go back to the 1st gen region after beating the game.
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts

If you've been a fan of Zelda in the past, you'd probably like Twilight Princess better.  Super Paper Mario is reading-intensive, so if you don't like your games loaded down with dialogue, avoid that. 

Personally, I haven't beaten SPM in the month I've had it, so I guess I liked Zelda more~

Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
its noon on mondays here in the US, not sure about the time in other regions.
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
i played blazing angels yesterday for 2 hours or so, MVP Baseball 2k5 for GC on it for 3 hours (was a day off).  trying to decide if i wanna keep it or no, i bought it used
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
blazing angels: squadrons of WWII
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts

[QUOTE="ZebethOrZebes"][QUOTE="SmoothMoved"][QUOTE="theICE_MAN"]all the people here who say they sucked probably just sucked at it. i thought they were great. VERY accurate.thnickaman13

I dint suck at them . Im just a pc gamer who knows how fps's are supossed to play .

As though humans are tanks? The fact that Red Steel required pivoting in order to rotate it made its controls better than the traditional dual-axis first-person aiming.

wrong. when someone has a gun out, they don't curve the gun around as they turn. they quickly point it where they want it.
you don't aim your weapon at the same speed as your body turns. you aim your gun first, then your body follows.
at any rate, a fixed center reticule just works better.

Fixed center probably works better, but you don't aim a gun without facing what you're aiming, unless you're james bond or somethin.

in fact, fixed center proves you wrong, you shift your whole body when you turn, your aim never precedes your movement. 

Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
check the IGN UK review, they sounded like soccer fans and gave it an 8.7
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
yeah but like, the VC is for classic games...and nintendo would be potentially cutting into their own profits, so don't expect it
Avatar image for Xerlaoth
Xerlaoth

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Xerlaoth
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts
i liked red steel on the whole, the little buggy moments aside..but why would you change the trigger?