@LPDisturbedHU: Witcher 3 is great, but not BB great. Fallout 4 is a glitchy mess, like its predecessor. MGSV is difficult to compare. ROTR is a movie.
@wrestlemaniaw: Witcher 3's combat is total s*** compared to BB's, and the story is intrusive to the gameplay on contrary to BB. Still a great game, with an excellent sense of exploration.
MGSV is tougher to compare, because it's a completely different game. My vote goes to BB still.
Bloodborne's combat is actually fun and well designed, the world is actually fun to explore instead of being a giant mass of land with many empty areas. The story is actually incorporated into the gameplay, unlike Witcher 3 which interrupts the player's involvement in the gameplay every 10 seconds for some stupid dialogue choice. Seriously, I hated Dragon Age because of this...
Don't get me wrong, Witcher is a great game, but Bloodborne (and Souls games, except DS2) are on another level.
I love Kevin, and I think he's the best professional reviewer around, but I simply cannot agree with him on DS2. The game is simply terrible, with horribly implemented difficulty, poor and uninspired level design, boring art direction and contradicting mechanics to the experience of Dark Souls.
The only reason that piece of s*** is hard to begin with is because of how incredibly cheap it is.
Xyekenvort's comments