Yo-SUP's forum posts

Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
Btw, did I mention you was a crybaby?@
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts

Pfft, there is no piece of evidence I could present you that would satisfy your need to attack/discredit me. Therefore I see no further point in continuing this mindless argument.

 

outworld222

Lol, I never attacked you! I gave a valid source while you posted a link to a guy who thinks discs are cartridges! What's your next attempt for damage control? :Lol:

 

Did u even look at my link? Time to face the music chump, you can cry to mom if you want. NOW you can say I attacked you, since you deserve it after that cop out b.s.!

Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
Did you start gaming recently? I would suggest just baring with the lower graphics because there are some great games with good gameplay in the PS1 library. It may take awhile to adjust from PS3/360 though. But that's what people played in the 90's. Now if you have't then I question your intentions with this thread, because what are you comparing age to?
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts

[QUOTE="Yo-SUP"][QUOTE="outworld222"]  I'm baaaack! First may I say, stfu you stupid douche bag troll? I come from two racially different parents. So I contend your false assertions. That being said, everything I said stands true. Do your research. outworld222

Don't even no what Inbred means good lord. And no, everything you said was wrong, you need to do research. Which you won't do because then you would be wrong and we all know that you are not ready to own up to that responsibility who knows what you will do. NES and the other two were all praised and all sold out when they all released pretty much at the same time. The magazines were saying gaming was back before they even came out, and the industry already was in the all clear in terms of profits. Stop watching noobtube and reading shittypedia. Some articles stating that the 7800's where sold out and the NES were barely moving units, it took the NES awhile with its policies to gain an inevitable foothold to victory as the media spun it in a way that made it seem the SM and the Atari7800 were not being supported, and a few years after the 4th gen started fans boys twisted everything upside down.

 

Yeah, only you're wrong.

 

Here's the article: http://www.retrojunk.com/article/show/1237/from-the-nes-to-total-success

 

I also looked up inbred on the dictionary. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/inbreeding

 

I need not say more.

Lol you're stupid. You said originally racially you thought inbreeding was race related. Now let's look at your link.

Well, it was really THE FIRST VIDEO GAME SYSTEM! It had a top loading system in where you put the cartridges at the top of the system and you could see half of the cartridge from the outside of the console. Although the shape of it was very odd. The kids of today might mistake this for an air conditioner.

hahaahhaha completely wrong.

The NES was launced in October of 1985

Lol?

and at the time, the idea of 2 games on one cartridge was just mind blowing

Wut?

It was one of the first games to actually have secret cheats or places you could go to, but were hard to find.

The nonsense and bad writing continues, i would believe you wrote it instantly if you told me.

So here are the simmilarities and differences of the NES and the Famicom: CARTRIDGES-

I have to give you credit, It's been awhile since i had a good laugh. That is not even a freaking cartridge. Not to mention that it contains nothing that proves my point wrong, my turn: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9B8qAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aioEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6904,3114594&dq=nintendo+atari&hl=en I win /thread
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
[QUOTE="outworld222"][QUOTE="Yo-SUP"]First two posts are inbred children. NES small and atari78 came out after the industry already recovered and were all the topic head of video games coming back. Some publications expressed excitement at the small hardware, some stated that atari78s were sold out and NES consoles were not moving. NES caught on around 2 years later when it's mono policies grabbed way to many devs and it seemed the other two had no support by the backstabbing media. also yes I can back most of this up, come at me.

I'm baaaack! First may I say, stfu you stupid douche bag troll? I come from two racially different parents. So I contend your false assertions. That being said, everything I said stands true. Do your research.

Don't even no what Inbred means good lord. And no, everything you said was wrong, you need to do research. Which you won't do because then you would be wrong and we all know that you are not ready to own up to that responsibility who knows what you will do. NES and the other two were all praised and all sold out when they all released pretty much at the same time. The magazines were saying gaming was back before they even came out, and the industry already was in the all clear in terms of profits. Stop watching noobtube and reading shittypedia. Some articles stating that the 7800's where sold out and the NES were barely moving units, it took the NES awhile with its policies to gain an inevitable foothold to victory as the media spun it in a way that made it seem the SM and the Atari7800 were not being supported, and a few years after the 4th gen started fans boys twisted everything upside down.
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
First two posts are inbred children. NES small and atari78 came out after the industry already recovered and were all the topic head of video games coming back. Some publications expressed excitement at the small hardware, some stated that atari78s were sold out and NES consoles were not moving. NES caught on around 2 years later when it's mono policies grabbed way to many devs and it seemed the other two had no support by the backstabbing media. also yes I can back most of this up, come at me.
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

  • Introduced the beloved 'D-pad' with the Game & Watch series in 1980, not to mention multi-screen capabilities here as well
  • First mainstream video game icon since Pac-Man, this cannot be overstated
  • The famicom featured a microphone in the controller that could be used during gameplay, most notably The Legend of Zelda, which had never been done before
  • Home consoles. Nintendo released the first widely-approachable console in history with the NES/Famicom
  • Motion Controls. Nintendo started that craze, love the idea or hate it, by integrating them into the entire structure of their Wii system
  • Handhelds. Nothing else needs to be said here
  • The SNES made 3d polygonal graphics possible for the first time on consoles by using the Super FX chip, and as mentioned above, shoulder buttons.

The list is huge, but I'm not even going to continue

Emerald_Warrior

1.Nope and Nope. It introduced Nintendos D-pad. Not THE D-pad. 2.No, there were others before then... 3.That is also not true, RDI 4. What does this even mean? 5. But they were not the first to do it, they just re-popularized it. I though you were listing firsts? 6. What does this even mean? 7. This is also not true. There were 3D graphics much earlier.

  1. Who had a d-pad before Nintendo's first Game & Watch in 1980?
  2. Before Pac-Man? Who? The ball in Pong? And when he means icon, I'm pretty sure he means icon not just within gaming, but also outside of it. Pac-Man and Mario are both recognized outside of gaming's realm due to mass popularity, mass marketing, mass merchandising, and other media such as cartoons, comic books, and kid's novels.
  3. Yeah, Nintendo wasn't the first one to do this. Magnavox Odyssey, Atari 2600, Fairchild Channel F, Intellivision, etc.
  4. Yeah, huh? I wouldn't be surprised if the NES did have a microphone accessory, but if it does it's not well-known or popular.
  5. Before the Wii even. The Power Glove, son. So yeah, Nintendo did do it first, failed at it, then tried again and popularized it.
  6. Again, not the first. First handheld system to be popular, sure. It does have that honor. But not THE first. Milton-Bradley gets that honor with the Microvision.
  7. Yeah, I have to give it to jak again. Not the first. Vectrex used vector graphics to make 3D polygons. Stripped down, bare-bones, skeletal 3D polygons; but they were there.

But regardless of what's first and what's not; that's not what really matters in the end. Atari was the first at a great many things, and look where they're at now; selling off their IPs. Nintendo's great games, and concern for quality is what makes them such a great company in gaming, IMO.

What is this Nintendo making the powerglove nonsense?
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
Is this all it takes now?
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
I came back to find a pile of false beliefs and misconception. Well, I have enough links to clean the place up this time.
Avatar image for Yo-SUP
Yo-SUP

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Yo-SUP
Member since 2013 • 357 Posts
I was right the first time. It's no wonder such tech people that used to be here a year or so back like Darkman don't post anymore. There are so many people that won't listen, that won't do research, that will claim things are wrong just because they have rose tinted glasses even though there are factual specs to back them up. But i have to say, when i read Emerald_warriors post of "Lol, it's not a direct port! nintendo did not release the game on the Colecovision!" that just blew my mind completely. Namco ported Wonderboy 3 to the PC-engine, There are GBA ports of console games ported by different developers. Thrust was ported by random guys to the 2600, there's a whole lot of people doing direct ports to the colecovision. But i look back at a ton of users not even 7 pages back, and it's a thing people actually do here. Spreading ignorance ad saying it's right is something that people just go with and i can't accept that much stupidity. I just don't see anyone who actually wants to do what every other retro community does out there: 1.Listening to those who had a lot of experience with consolesyou may not know too much about. 2.Researching or looking at sources or facts provided. 3.Look at the spec sheets and the game comparisons 4.Learn the history of classic games or consoles 5.Have conversations without people denying left and right because of rose tinted glasses 6.intentional trolling. 7.people jumping on the high-level bandwagon. 8.Talking about hidden gems and obscure games people might want to collect. This is not a retro community, it's the New system wars with older consoles. I say new system wars because it's a big trainwreck of what it used to be, So since you guys prefer tolling, not learning anything, collecting, or even learning new and interesting things you may not have known about "heaven forbid" i will be sticking to the usual retro communities that do this. I suggest those who also agree follow these links: www.retrogamer.netwww.digitpress.com/forum (they are a bit off sometimes) Atariage.com www.retrovideogamer.co.uk http://atariage.com/forums/topic/167027-msx-to-coleco/(Talks about porting games from old consoles) chipmusic.org www.oldschool-gaming.comwww.videogameconsolelibrary.com (There are some inaccuracies, especially for reasons certain consoles failed, but gives some nice information, and game previews) www.assemblergames.com The high level of not even accepting knowledge and pushing unproven views on others is basically just System Wars in disguise. There's a website for that called Systemwars.com, so if this whole site in the forum section is basically Systemwars, there is no reason to be here. I suggest those who have only posted a few times in the last few months (I looked back, many people not even 15 or so pages back post anymore), you should visit these sites. They will give you a refreshing experience.