IMO Microsoft has the greater loss especially since Insomniac are still going to be working on PS3 exclusives.FlamesOfGrey

true but at least MS slowed them down. insomiace usually pumps out one game per year for ps3. now itll be every other year ps3 gets an exclusive :P

So here's to another lemming who tries to pass off opinions on games as facts. I played Halo 3's average campaign and slightly above average multiplayer and would have missed nothing had I not played them. Certainly didn't kept me kept me from play CoD4 when that came out. The fact is PS3 plays multiplats just as well as 360 without having to pay for live. It offers additional unique experience that's no available on the 360. TC's argument is also based on the flaw reasoning of multiplayer>singleplayer which isn't true for everyone. mysterj

well he has sales figures to back up his claim..........if ppl like you were right, PS3 wouldnt be last place right???????

When halo 3 is either the #1 or #2 game on LIVE for almost 3 years...........that kinda ruins your input on it.

ps3 plays multiplats just as well...........im sorry but :lol:

MP > SP for the majority of gamers nowadays.Majority > minority. Sorry thats life :)

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] :lol: :lol: Ohh Man, So then i guess Gears and halo are possibly on PS3 thenAnimal-Mother

........u didnt get it at all.

they arent possible.......for legal reasons offcourse.

So then it's a loophole of only on xbox 360 as well.

Ohh Wait

ya.......3rd party games are weird like that. nothing is guaranteed with 3rd party stuff

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Friend I have put more hours in MW2 for 360, ~30 hrs, than all my PS3 games combined...plus i still play my 360 more.

As you say:

Nice try

DroidPhysX

u cant prove that.

nice try again.

I see:

Time played: 30 hours on MW2.

And I probably only played a litte over 3 hours of MGS4 and beat the UC2 campaign in 10 hours+ around 6 hours of MP.

Nice try.

And you cant prove that its "Sony propaganda" thats saying theres a large gap between the graphics of PS3 and 360

sure i can....its common sense. seeing 360s best games (exclusive, 360/PC, and even multiplat)........there really isnt that big a gap.

it truly is propaganda and fanboy mob mentality.

I guess the 360 is over the hump. It's all downhill from here, folks.musicalmac

after 5 years thats a really healthy sign of a well rounded console.

Time to pick up a PS3, it seems.

-Snooze-

if uve been keeping track of recent sales figures.........360 seems to be the console to get over ps3 :P

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

Many seem to think that it means that other consoles, namely the 360, cant pull off the game on itself..........when that is usually flat out wrong. Multiple disks, compression, installs, whatever it takes, a 360 can play any ps3 game.

So why say the PR statement?

1. Industry politics.

2. It actually means that it isnt possible because the IP is owned by Sony. Killzone 2 is POSSIBLE on 360..........but Sony would sue MS if it ever came to 360. 360 COULD play uncharted 2............but Sony owns the IP. 360 COULD play God of War 3............but again the IP is owned by Sony.

You think it means technical issues..........but its really legal issues that make Sony say those statements.

Halo 3 isnt possible on PS3...........because MS owns Halo.

Gears of War isnt possible on PS3...........because MS made a 360/PC agreement with Epic.

Viva Pinata isnt possible on PS3......because MS owns Rare.

Get it?

Animal-Mother

........u didnt get it at all.

they arent possible.......for legal reasons offcourse.

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Which is why I got my 360 in July of '09 and PS3 in June '10?

DroidPhysX

that means nothing. owning a 360 doesnt take away a personal bias.

nice try.

Friend I have put more hours in MW2 for 360, ~30 hrs, than all my PS3 games combined...plus i still play my 360 more.

As you say:

Nice try

u cant prove that.

nice try again.

Then explain why ps3 exclusives are the best looking games this gen?ThePsTriple

u neglect that many 360 games produce graphics that are comparable to those games. the gap isnt as wide as Sony propaganda likes to to think.

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Sorry friend, but i stopped right there. That comment made this thread void in my opinion

DroidPhysX

i see sony got inside ur head. np. this thread isnt for you.

Which is why I got my 360 in July of '09 and PS3 in June '10?

that means nothing. owning a 360 doesnt take away a personal bias.

nice try.