this

Okami

MGS3

Red Dead Redemption

I thought it had one of the worst endings ever. You spend a few hours doing boring farming missions. The goverment comes out of nowere with no build up it just felt weird. Then you get to the big shootout Uncle dies who I feel no compassion for becuase Marston was a **** to him the whole time. After Marston dies(Which I also felt no compassion for becuase he is a douche bag) you get to do that mission with his son to kill that one guy which is a pretty boring mission. Overall the story for RDR wasnt very good luckily the characters and the world saved the game.

All they have shown are sequals and crappy casual games. We ever going to get some new IPs that arent designed for the elderly or 5 year olds?

Discuss

And 2 of those are on wii (and you can play the first game of all time on wii as well). All three are EXCLUSIVE to nintendo hardware.

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html

What you got, cows and lemmings? What you got?

Hmmmmmmmm?

Hermits stay out of this, you guys operate in a different league, your games are serious business.

But for the consolites, what you got? Hmmmmm?

Hmmmm?

Who's your daddy now?

:lol:

IgorAntunov

Wii has great 1st party exclusives to bad everything else sucks. I would buy a Wii but would probably only play Mario and Zelda.

[QUOTE="Sky-"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]10 on any score means perfect, and as much i like some games, i will never give one a 10 (no game is perfetc). But i also believe we should use the full 1-10 scale, so most games that score a 9.0 on GS wouldbe a 7.5-8.5, 9 should be EXTREMLY hard to get. but then again GS would never use a feature.lordreaven

Kevin Van-Ord explained what a 10 on GameSpot means in the sticky.

Well that is silly. Just because a skyscraper is now the world's tallest doesn't mean that skyscrapers will no longer be built, and that no skyscraper will ever be taller. You can also refer to our description of what a 10 means on this site: "This exceedingly rare score refers to a game that is as perfect as a game can aspire to be at its time of release. Obviously, the constantly changing standards for technology and gameplay will probably make this game obsolete some day, but at its time of release, a game earning this score could not have been improved upon in any meaningful way." We acknowledge that a game may be bested one day, but based on everything that has existed to this point in time, we do not believe that Super Mario Galaxy 2 could have been meaningfully improved.

But gaming will not die because SMG2 is as close to perfect as it could have been reasonably expected to be. If I eat the most delicious meal I have ever eaten for dinner this evening, I will not stop eating, nor does that make it impossible for a meal to be made that is even more delicious one day.

The great thing about games is that developers will always be creating fresh ideas. For that, we should be grateful, because it means that there will be more amazing games to play in the future. But that doesn't detract from what SMG2 is right now. Check out the last three sentence of the review. They would seem to speak directly to you: "Super Mario Galaxy 2 is so phenomenal that it's difficult to imagine where Mario could possibly go in the future. But that's hardly your concern now. Mario proves that he is still the king of fun."Kevin-V

Enjoy.

Your logic is so stupid it is hard for me to understand. If you wont give a game a 10 isnt it just a 1-9 scale? Which means 9 would be perfect but then you wouldnt give it that .

wii 10 is the equivalent to 360 5.0

farnham

Oh no he didnt