adastos' forum posts

Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts
[QUOTE="adastos"]I chose other. If it is a shooter I usually go 360 because 360 is made for them and have more people to play online, but if it is other things I go with PS3. Street fighter I bought for both because I wanted to play with friends online and some only own either a PS3 or a 360.tok1879
Hey, i'm curious, i only own a PS3. What are the differences btw SFIV on both consoles?

It is easier to do Chun Li's super move on the 360 ^_^
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts
You can probably get HS for cheap as used. Seeing as it is such a short game a used copy is practically new. ^_^
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts
I chose other. If it is a shooter I usually go 360 because 360 is made for them and have more people to play online, but if it is other things I go with PS3. Street fighter I bought for both because I wanted to play with friends online and some only own either a PS3 or a 360.
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts
Halo 3, GTAIV, Gears of War, and Bioshock. Halo 3 had good multiplayer, but the single player sucked balls and that is what makes me enjoy games. GTA IV just felt to much like a copy and paste of its predecessors and annoying at the same time. Gears because it felt like I played through this type of story before and that story gets old after awhile. As for Bioshock for some reason I could not get into though I really wanted, because I loved the idea imo the good ending was for lack of the better words gay
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts
So I can play with friends who only have a PS3 or only have a 360.
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts

What a bunch of losers boycotting a game, It's only 60 usd. If you can't afford 60 usd, you might as well packed and get yourself a new hobby.therealnerdd
Heh I agree. Being a Sony person I am use to promises being broken, so i don't really care.

Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts

@adastos: PCs last longer than consoles. Fact. Both in terms of quality of parts and in terms of performance. A PC lasting longer than five years it quite common. A Console that lasts more than five years is very rare if it's used regularly.

This is so obvious that I'm not going to waste my time even explaining it to you. Just know.

And, know, that all of us who understand technology are laughing at your post :D

DeckardLee
Heh I was just trying to explain what the other guy meant also like I said it was a big exaggeration on my part. Of course PCs last longer, but I would assume that to keep playing at a good quality you would need to upgrade down the line. I'm not saying the PS3 will last 10 years, but if it does I would think down the line you would have needed to upgrade your PC at least once. So in the long run, and that is what we are talking about here the PS3 will be cheaper.
Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts

[QUOTE="adastos"]I think he means something along the lines of, if it does go the 10 years, it will play the new games 10 years from now while if you bought a PC it will be outdated by that time and while the console graphics get better with time PC is still hindered. For example try playing todays games with a geforce 2 series.AnnoyedDragon

This argument is intellectually bankrupt...

Anyone want to address it or should I?

Please do because I doubt anyone will. Also it was a big exageration on my part

Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts

[QUOTE="Jackboot343"]

Except the PS3 is more futureproof than this PC.

And you forgot the disc drive and cooling, in addition to what other users are saying.

DAZZER7

please define future-proof as I hope you're not gonna start with the usual, "you're gonna need to upgrade in 6 months"

I think he means something along the lines of, if it does go the 10 years, it will play the new games 10 years from now while if you bought a PC it will be outdated by that time and while the console graphics get better with time PC is still hindered. For example try playing todays games with a geforce 2 series and windows 2000(Is windows 2000 even supported in games anymore?)

Avatar image for adastos
adastos

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 adastos
Member since 2007 • 465 Posts

I would say Alan Wake