angel9ramos7's comments

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cartman: You still haven't explained why you're mad that black people are in the game but not mad that Zombies are in it. You just said zombies have been in CoD games. So have black people.

It's annoying that people have to complain about anything that has to do with blacks but still say "It's not that I don't like black people, but..."

You obviously have some sort of problem and it's not about historical accuracy.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cartman: That's just your opinion. This is the first time I've seen anybody mad that CoD includes black people. If you're that upset then just don't be a black character.

You say you don't have a problem with black people, but you're more mad about them than you are about zombies. You say it's just a game so that's why zombies are in there. Same with the black people.

Black women are added to multiplayer, not the campaign. Multiplayer isn't for storytelling. You have people dying and coming back to life just to run and grab a flag. I assure you, WW2 didn't have team deathmatch, capture the flag, killstreaks, etc.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cartman: Again, you speak out against another group like they're a bad thing. Who cares if someone's trans? You think trans soldiers are going to go into battle in drag? They would look like a man or woman normally would.

I get what you're saying about pandering. Some games or movies make it a big point that they added women or minorites to a game like they expect a Nobel Peace Prize. Maybe CoD is doing that for good PR.

Still, Zombies Mode is incredibly inaccurate. There were absolutely no zombies in WW2. Does that mean we should remove it from the game? No, because we like it. You can't expect a game with zombies to be historically accurate.

It seems like you just have your own problems with blacks and trans people.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@KerrinScott: I don't think he understands that having a job isn't a right, it's a privilege. Look at what happened to Delta Airlines. Few workers drag a guy off a plane and literally thousands of people have said outright that they will not use Delta.

But since we're talking about when they're outside of work, one police officer posted a picture on Facebook of someone drowning a child and the caption said, "When your daughter has a crush on a negro boy." Even if he is 100% joking, the damage is already done. Black civilians can't feel as safe around that officer. Btw I don't know if he was fired.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cartman: And adding black female characters to games where people want them has been a staple of the video game industry for years.

You can't be mad about one little inaccuracy and ignore one big one, zombies.

It's the same kind of bias you see in majorly white neighborhoods. "We don't hate black people, we just want to keep the neighborhood the way it's always been." There's literally no harm done by adding black characters to a game. A lot of black people play the game and it's what they want.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cartman: Funny how you have a problem with black people but no problem with Zombies...

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Pelezinho777: It's pretty fun. Like a war version of Overwatch. But if you like BF then you might not like this since nobody plays as a team. Use the trial time to test it out.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@domiddian: If you're going into the morality of it, let me explain it. Imagine that you own a reputable business. If you had a worker that wished death on all Catholics, that wouldn't sit right with your Catholic customers. It's legal to wish death on people so the law can't do anything about it. You should be able to fire anyone who poses a harm to your company's image. If that employee stays, then your public image is ruined. It could be as simple as a tweet that says "Android > Apple" while working at Apple. Or it could be an extreme to where employees' social media pages have said they hated n******. Imagine someone hating your race and being in charge of preparing your food. You wouldn't want that so you wouldn't go there anymore. As an owner, you can lose large portions of your customers and your reputation.

You're free to do whatever you want outside of work, but make sure those things don't pose a detriment to the ethics of that business.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@proxima1025: This episode had me conflicted on which side I wanted to win. They introduced new conflicts between two major characters that I feel will end up in a divide.

Avatar image for angel9ramos7
angel9ramos7

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Mogan: 360p is an eyesore but after like 5 minutes my eyes adjust and I hardly notice it. I assure you movie theater camera quality is much worse. But I will be rewatching this Sunday to see the battles in all their glory.