aprioristic's forum posts

  • 40 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
I did not agree with the BBC reporters arguement. Does the law, general consensus, or his contemporary obligation to the BBC necessarily define the truth reliability of normative assertions. If you attempting suicide over social refutation, such as being 'trolled' by text, should you subject yourself to such a social environment? As for the "troll", any physical truama is indirect harm. Opinions are acknowledged to be subjective beliefs, are subjective beliefs harmful? If the consequent conditions are direct harm, yes. However, this arguementation is moral philosophy, unless you contradictingly cogent such values in politics and law. It is a self refuting concept. I simply believe in causation.
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
I disagree. I am generally replaying classics, such as arcanum, generally for the story. Text only is also fine.
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
The conditions of intelligence have been defined by scientfic consensus, however it does not appear to be of natural science, it appears to be of social/normative science, meaning there is normative assumptions, furthermore I am not certain of the reductionalism that is applied in this case. My official intelligent quotient was measured by performence and verbal concepts.
Correlation doesn't equate to causation. th3warr1or
Excellent, you have refuted fallicious assumptions. Statistical facts (empirical facts) does not cogent correlations or normative assumptions, such as this how 'intelligence' ought to be defined. There is no logical basis in this case, hence a logical fallacy (infomal spectrum).
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
I orginally did, Resident Evil 2 and 3 have yet to be released in the European stoe. As for my US account, I used $100 credit, however my account was banned the following day.
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
If knowledge is defined as "cheating", yes it satisfies the required conditions.
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
Has anyone fully experienced both the Chinese and English versions of Final Fantasy XIII/XIII-2? From my experience of Final Fantasy 13, I would argue that the dubbing was 'fair', being superior to many JRPGs of the past, however recently hearing the Japanese voice work/soundtrack variations, it does appear to be the superior experience, that I never in fact experienced, I feel more 'absorbed' by simply viewing the Japanese cutscenes. Therefore, I may consider purchasing Final Fantasy XIII in Japanese prior to XIII-2, though any reasons that suggest otherwise will be taken into account. Would anyone else playthrough Final Fantasy XIII a second time to experience the Japanese voice work, excluding interpretations of gamplay? Also, does the Western release for XIII-2 have a Japanese dubbing option?
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts

don't you observe it? oftentimes people misunderstand what atheism means, because they say you don't believe in Jesus Christ, they don't really understand that atheists don't believe in ANY god or being...most of the time they are branded as anti-christ, etc.

I'm not defending athiests, I'm a catholic myself and imo it's impossible that we came out of nothing, or out of some big bang theory, just saying that some people think wrong about athiests..

solely
Athiest lack belief in theistic Gods, an athiest need not be a metaphysical naturalist. Can you define "nothing"? Can it be actualised?
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
Time is measured in the intervals of space. Are you suggesting that there is infinite regress?
Avatar image for aprioristic
aprioristic

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 aprioristic
Member since 2012 • 41 Posts
Yes, I have also out ran a 'black guy'. Is there any evolutionary arguements that suggest a 'black guy' has more performence in running activities? Species has no universal definition, furthermore a sub species only increases the fuzzyness, lastly "race" has no scientific definition to operate.
  • 40 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4