@88mikelll: But you're one of the special ones who isn't like that. Thank goodness we have people like you to rise above the rest of us and achieve the level of wisdom you oh so clearly have,

I'm looking forward to playing Uncharted 4 but I ain't touching the multiplayer with a 39 1/2 foot pole.

Alcoholic recovery centers are about to see a large influx of 12 year-olds.

@rasdorx: Well I read the reviews too as well as looking at the pros and cons. I just use the number in addition to those.

@browland1: Though the numerical scoring system certainly doesn't paint the whole picture it isn't without its merits. It shows that you may have a lot negative to say about a game, say Skyrim for example, and yet it is still fantastic. Or it could work the other way you may have very little negative to say about a game and yet it still wouldn't really be worth getting.

Over all for me the scores can be helpful. For me this is roughly how I look at it. A 6-7 is get from the used been. An 8 is a get when the price drops a little. A 9 is possible new purchase. And a 10 is a rush out and get.

I do wish the numbers were more consistent though. Cuz like you said AC Syndicate got a 9 for basically doing nothing at all.

@blood_borne: That's relevant?

Is it just me or are there more people talking about butt-hurt fanboys than there are actual fanboys?

That's about what I expected. I've been a big Halo fan for years but it's no secret that it has passed its hay-days.

Now that Bungie is no longer the main dev the whole thing just seems to have lost nearly all its dramatic scale. Still fun just not quite the same.

Damn it Naughty Dog, you're better than that.

I guess the days of having microtransactionless multiplayer are just totally gone.

@unreal849: LOL