@GazaAli said:
Hipsterism, because being a plain old atheist is no longer trendy.
/thread
As a Christian myself, I actually agree with this response.
I'd compare my own beliefs, however, to a Soren Kierkegaard or Thomas Merton, both of whom worked and tested their own beliefs to see if they truly propelled them to be "better," to have a purpose, and to benefit not only themselves (which I indicated first) but those around them. Foraying into whether God is worthy of contemplating about is an important question. For me, I contemplate about Him/Her often, for I find myself to be continually renewed in my thinking, doing, and "being" when I look through or at least towards a source outside of myself, and outside of the constructs of society itself. This is why I spend a great deal of time focusing on how Christians lived prior to Constantine; many people assume Christianity has always had a fairly dark history, but it wasn't really until Constantine hijacked the religion that it became narrow-minded and warlike. To sum up, I have overcome my anger, my narrow-mindedness, and my ignorance by looking to an absolute model or standard of a person and doing whatever I can to act like them.
Progress for its own sake worries me because no matter how altruistic someone's or some society's progressive agenda is, if something beyond is not looked to as the "final answer" or "final judge," it seems the progress could become easily corrupted. We see this also in another thread on the page with the 1st amendment/PC discussion. It seems "progressive" to arrest/make illegal hateful or prejudiced comments or speech, but if they are outlawed, where then do you stop? Where will the line end?
Log in to comment