bentleg's forum posts
Ok these forums are full of fanboys, but how many people would actually admit it?
While I would say no, to be honest sony do slightly annoy me. And am pulled a bit more to m$.
"Sony is going to own in a year time, when they get all these top game games"
Am I the only one sick of hearing all this stuff. The fact is sony need to get thier act together now. Not in 6 months now. While people can say all this awsome stuff what the ps3 can do the fact is its not doing it and belive it or not M$ and and nintendo are not going to be twiddling thier thumbs waiting for sony to catch up. Seriously get it together.
[QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="steviewonder89"]Lets be real here. If Ps3 had no Blu-Ray, it would cost around $400. With that price and power of the playstation brand it would be selling better than Wii and the 360 sales would be like 100K a month at this point.steviewonder89
I don't care. I wouldn't have bought it without Bluray.
Considering that the average person probably does not even know what Blu-Ray is and cannot afford a $600 console. Seriously, just walk through your local mall and survey people with the question "What is Blu-Ray?". I bet 75% of them will not know what you are talking about. The exclusion of Blu-Ray would have made ps3 another ps2.
And the PS2 sold like crazy which was pretty much an update of PS1 which sold like crazy.
You people do realize every game is run in BLu-Ray right? :|
Nerkcon
Yeah it lets them put all the language tracks on one disc.
No. Many people got it to save $400 on a Blu-Ray player.Nerkcon
Equally many people haven't brought it because they have no need for a blue ray player and thats why it costs so much.
Would the PS3 be in a better postion without the blueray, built in wifi etc... and lower price tag?
Log in to comment