Seriously, who announces a gaming console, only to talk about tv, and sports? 3 games were mentioned, none of which, had any actual gameplay. They said their wanting to wait till e3 to show the games, that is a terrible marketing decision. And to microsoft, if these 8 new exclusives are going to revolve around kinect, dont even bother making them. No one wants kinect, yet you keep pushing for it. Just quit.

@HipHopBeats After seeing all that crap with no games talked about, always online has suddenly became the least of my worries.

I know sony didnt have the actual console there, but they told the specs of the console, and talked about how easy it will be for developers to make games for it. microsoft had the console, but i think they might have been ashamed to tell what the specs are.

@MADDjoe Yeah its not alreays online. But even that dont makeup for the fact that its a tv box.

The Wii U has never looks so....groundbreaking.

Im calling it. Call of duty ghosts is show playing on xbox one first, so xbox wins by fanboy default of call of duty.

Seriously? Say something about Halo, and its not even a game????? Just no. I dont care if it can watch tv, I already have a satellite for that. And I dont want to play a sports game that ive already played for the past thousand years. On top of that, with all the tv, and cloud strage, that confirms always online, so PS4 PS4 PS4

39 min in. Ive watched how the xbox one is a satalite reciever, and NO GAMEPLAY OF ANYTHING.

Not interested in any half life news unless the title contains somewhere in the title "Half-Life: Episode 3" or "Half-Life 3"

Why are all of these Nintendo fanboys putting the blame on EA? Anyone with a brain knows that the Wii U isnt even as powerful as current gen xbox and ps3, so its common sense that its not going to run next gen graphics engines, or even some current gen ones at that. Developers know this, so why would they release Battlefield 4 on the Wii U if the graphics wouldnt be up to par with the other systems, and have horrible frame rate? Anything under 30 frames is practically unacceptable. Most 3rd party developers would just be digging their own hole if they release a game on the Wii U. Its obvious that MOST next gen games will be running on either frostbite 3, or unreal engine 4. Wii U cant run either of these engines, so things dont look good.

And to the Nintendo fanboys, yes the Wii U can run frostbite 3, or unreal engine 4. But lets be honest here, a 5 year old PC can run Crysis 3, but would you really want to play it on a 5 year old PC? Would it even be playable? Just because a system can run something, dosent mean its playable.