[QUOTE="bforrester"]DeadMan1290
That's pretty much why I'm not compelled to get a 360 right now. There's no variety. I hope this shooter fad goes away soon.
QFT. The only game I'm actually jealous of X360 owners is Ace Combat, because I liked it on PS2. Otherwise, there's just a wealth of quality, exclusive titles across genres, on the PS consoles. There's just no answer to God of War, Ratchet and Clank, and Jak and Daxter, andUnchartedon the Xbox. Splinter Cell just doesn't compare to MGS. Forza isslightly better in physics and considerably in AI, but GT to me has a better overall package. The multi-plats are just that...multi plat. Hooray, I get to play those too!
Unfortunately I agree with you. Damn teh cows teh cell beats teh 360:cry:..More variety of games, means better games to choose from instead of the same ol' alien killing, saving earth type of shooter. One question though wasn't that partof the original Xbox's success?
Heck yeah shooters were part of Xbox success. They're not for everyone though. I enjoy them from time to time, but I'd rather tool around San Andreas or strum a few cords on GH. Maybe level up my Groovitron on Ratchet. Variety is the spice of life for me. PS3 is just more spicey. I won't tell you the 360 doesn't have some great games...it's obvious from the fan following on SW that it has some stellar games. But for a cheapskate like me that only owns 1 console a Gen, they just don't call to me like PS games.
Log in to comment