My problem with TLJ wasn't that it subverted expectations. But as I've listed the real issues several times now, I'm not going to go into detail again. Just find it funny that outlets still don't understand the real problems with TLJ.
@Hagan: I don't see how the prequels had a childish tone. If anything, it was a darker tone that the originals. The writing was definitely bad, the humor stupidly cheesy, and much of the acting piss-poor, but I wouldn't say it had a childish tone.
"Each film was directed by Brett Ratner, who in 2017 was accused by multiple women of sexual harassment or misconduct. In 2011, he was dropped as a producer of The Oscars after he made a gay slur."
Relevance?
I wouldn't mind watching another Rush Hour. They aren't brilliant movies, but still entertaining.
Not unexpected. I knew it would flop just from the trailers.
That said, I actually thought it was a good watch, even with its many flaws. Keep in mind, I've never read the source material, so I was going into it completely blind.
It's established in the lore that Dumbledore avoided fighting Grindelwald for as long as possible because of the situation surrounding Grindelwald, Aberforth and Ariana.
But I still think it's stupid to throw Newt at him like that, though.
If I'm being quite honest, I'd rate the game a 7.5 - 8.0. It has flaws, some significant, but it's enjoyable enough to play all the way through and then some. It's a highly disappointing sequel to the original trilogy and I hope they get their act together for the next one.
BigDegs' comments