space is called space for a reason. it's full of empty f***ing space. the closest stars to earth are a little over 4 light years away. that means travelling at the speed of light it would still take four years to get somewhere of any particular value.
and yes, there was that one experiments where they had a particle possibly travelling faster than light (supposedly, i have a hard time fully subscribing to this just yet), but that doesn't mean we will be able to create any vessel big enough to fit humans to even get close to the speed of ligh
[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"][QUOTE="curono"]Hope you are trolling. Humans are composed out of carbon chains...biohaznerd
This. All living things have carbon. Water does not. Water is not alive.
not true. what about those cells that were found that weren't carbon based? i can't remember what the base was off the top of my head but it wasn't carbon.
while carbon is arguably the best base for life, it's not neccessarly the only one. altough i agree the tc's idea of water being alive is just stupid.
tbh off the top of my head, being a double major in chem/bio, a good base could potentially be silicon.
[QUOTE="curono"]Hope you are trolling. Humans are composed out of carbon chains...Samurai_Xavier
This. All living things have carbon. Water does not. Water is not alive.
not true. what about those cells that were found that weren't carbon based? i can't remember what the base was off the top of my head but it wasn't carbon.
while carbon is arguably the best base for life, it's not neccessarly the only one. altough i agree the tc's idea of water being alive is just stupid.
Log in to comment