@Vozlov @blackrunie you're not reading what i'm saying.
i was talking about next-gen versions.
if they develop for PC first, they'll develop for hardware more advanced than the next-gen consoles, which means they'd have to lower the graphical side of the game in order to make it work on those next-gen consoles.
with PC people clamouring for GTA V at all, it makes sense to develop for the next-gen first and then just port it over to PC, giving them experience with next-gen consoles as well.
rockstar will wait a couple of months, release GTA V for next-gen consoles and port that to the PC.
if they'd make it for the PC, they'd have to downscale it, which means extra work, for next-gen consoles. this way, they'll upgrade the visuals of the game they already have and just port that.
that has been disproven for decades. it was true when colour tv's were introduced and it gave massive amounts of radiation. today's television can be watched at any distance, any, without any damage to your eyes.
sure you can get eye strain, but you can also get that from watching tv at a ''good'' distance. eye strain easily heals with a good night's rest.
''clarified'', no. clarifying implies you told the truth and refined it a bit to make it clearer. this is just blatantly telling a lie and pathetically trying to cover it up ''but i can be upscaled, it looks great!''. get out microsoft, just get out.
hmm, i remember a time when video game reviews weren't just the written review with parts cut out. when video game reviews were just a person standing there, reviewing it live, maybe with a few notes, but never as scripted as it is now.
maybe it wasn't that spectacular, but it was honest. emphasis wasn't placed on every single word, only when a reviewer was honestly amazed by it. it was honest, it was real.
blackrunie's comments