blackrunie's comments

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By blackrunie

@MW2ismygame

and while you're at it, stop pestering us with stupid LoL progamer news, we don't care.
also, tell caroline that she/he should stop pushing feminist articles on us.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@juboner @blackrunie

it doesn't work that way, have you heard of the burden of proof? it states that whenever you claim something, you have to prove it, or it will be disregarded.

some time ago, someone claimed there was a god (the postulate i mentioned earlier) and backed it up with the bible, which is a logical fallacy since their credulity is linked: if the bible is a lie, so is god and vice versa, so using one as an argument for the other is a circulus in probando, or a circle reasoning.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By blackrunie

@Defender1978 @PotHeel

you should know, everything can be brought back to politics, in a way.
as long as bigots keep appearing, spewing random lines from their books, this'll never end.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@juboner

yes, refer to your holy book, a book of stories built upon the postulate that god exists.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Suikogaiden

it's called an analogy, it's when you take the thought process out of the case and apply to a different example, to show that it makes no sense.

you said it shouldn't happen because they're just imitating females.
1. who said that? you have provided no source, so your claims can't be verified and taken for true
2. i used my analogy to show that you can basically call anything ''imitating'' the other sex.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Suikogaiden @blackrunie

who says that? a man having sex with another man is just that: 2 men engaging in sexual intercourse.

you might as well ban female players from baseball leagues because they're just imitating male baseball players. it makes no sense.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By blackrunie

@Suikogaiden @ollirg

why would homosexuals be inferior, explain your reasoning, and don't refer to a religion, since those don't have a rational basis.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Suikogaiden

are you kidding me? homsexuals are identical to you and me, save for their preference for the sex of their partner. what's wrong with that? it's like you being criticized for your musical taste: it's out of your hands and you have a right to it.


Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

58% percent of US adults are idiots, who don't understand the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc.

Avatar image for blackrunie
blackrunie

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

bullshit EA, microtransactions are fine, but shouldn't impact gameplay. this is what you claim whenever you release a product containing them and then it turns out like battlefield heroes, battlefield play4free, battlefield 3, dead space 3 etc.