and also, isn't it too soon to talk about sale numbers? the game barely launched, i was going to get around the first 2 dead spaces. this kind of news puts a stop in a lot of people who would buy the game.
Who would buy a game that probably won't have much more support?
Am I the only one who thinks it would sell a whole lot more if it was available on steam? I don't buy physical copies of pc games anymore, and origins is just... awful.
i love sony, my ps3 and have high hopes for ps4, but i'm not going to buy a mediocre handheld (with a great potential if sony wasn't making awful decisions with it) just to support a billionaire company. Sony is charging $100 for a 32gb memory card, if a company is doing stupid things, i'm just not going to be a part of it. Fanboys that would do that are a minority, or at least i'd rather think so, because that is the cancer of gaming industry; buying games or consoles just because it's from a certain company or holds a certain name, not actually checking if it's good or not. That's what makes games like RE6 and annuals COD' sell that much.
Don't tell me US crisis is the reason WII U sale suck. They lost to Vita in japan FFS. And the sales of current gen (past gen, whatever) consoles are still higher.
Wii U sales suck because they released an expensive console, with really poor marketing, and nothing really new in comparison with 360 and ps3 besides a tablet controller.
Not to offend or anything, but it doesn't seem you quite get the theory of evolution. We have common ancestors with gorillas, but it doesn't mean we came from the gorillas. Let's take two hypothetical different "tribes" of our ancestors and try to simplify. One of them leaves near fruit trees and have plenty of that to survive, no predators literally chasing your tail, and the need to be protected from the cold with hair. The other one, lives in a jungle where the tail was nothing more than something a predator could get, the climate was hotter, and fruits weren't as plenty so we needed to hunt for food. One of them evolved to grow hairier, an evolved tail for balance to get to higher trees and the ability to need only fruits to survive. the other one eventually lost it's tail (because the ones that had would die before they breed) his hair, and now need protein in its system instead of only fruits.
Of course this is an hypothetical situation, but just to exemplify how two species can coexist and have the same ancestor. The theory of evolution has some gaps, because we do not have 100% of evidence, but those are filled with predictions, and a great number of those predictions were found to be true, and most of the theory is pretty solid, those gaps are mostly details that are missing.
blackzio's comments