since when did 1 game ever save your console. ff7isnumbaone

haha, was that a joke? firstly, halo saved xbox. Secondly, my console doesn't need saving.

:|

you're either retarded or really want war.

[QUOTE="mingo123"][QUOTE="RazMaTaz-1"]

[QUOTE="DrinkDuff"]I'd say its around the same level as Halo 3, with better models but worse textures.RazMaTaz-1

:lol:

Ive played Halo 3 and the graphics were bogus. Master chief looked great graphically, but the humans did not. Also, Halo 3 ran at 30 FPS, i mean come on, its freaking next gen for crying out load. Also, Jaggies all over the place. I aint saying that RFOM2 will top it in terms of scores, but there are alot of games i personally believe that are better than Halo. Bioshock being 1, and Darkness being 2.

For god's sake, shut up with the "omgz it's not 60fps" fact is, it's a first person shooter, not a racer. It doesn't need 60 frames. Heck, we can't even see 30 frames, so why does it matter?

[QUOTE="Unreal_393"][QUOTE="Captain-win"]

[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="dipper145"]I honestly thought you were kidding when you said they were the best graphics this gen, thats just an embarassment to otehr games saying that. I mean sure it looks pretty good, but its nothing amazing. Maybe slightly above average for this gen..mingo123

besides crysis.

you can't have played Cod 4. I found my jaw consistantly on the ground when watching the animations. It's probably the best body animations I've seen this gen.

[QUOTE="braydee1234"]Gameplay. Put it this way, Crysis is the best looking game out there, but it'll never be considered a classic game. Just one that pushed forward graphics in games._Pedro_

trust me Crysis is going to be considered a classics because of it's graphics. To be more specific it's graphics engine, Crysis is most certainly going to follow the same path as Quake 3.

Would you consider Doom 3 a classic?