[QUOTE="psn8214"]

Still no PC version. :( :P

mitu123

Alan Wake HD 1080p (the most I ever run) = ummm. I'd bite it.

Wasnt this one of the games that cows were hyping up against Alan Wake? lol, A 7.5 and trust me Im not buying it.

SlimWifi

So...you're in this thread for what reason exactly?>>>>

[QUOTE="clone01"] i'm a consolite, and i don't want crysis gone...i just don't care.AnnoyedDragon

If you don't want Crysis gone; what makes you think I'm referring to you with that comment? Also note consolite refers to ignorant console fanatics that bash alternatives like PC, does that describe yourself?

I don't get people who choose to take comments that clearly weren't meant for them personal, like L0we or however you spell his name.

calm down homie you seem a little to agressive. No one is ignorant for what they like. If that's the case he could call you ignorant for what you say about consoles, it goes both ways.

:lol: you talk like you're better than other fanboys here or something? is that what you believe?

It'll score an A, but I can't wait for this baby!

Chutebox

what he said^

I can see GS giving this atleast an AE rating. Tho GS also game Shenmue an Ae rating so it won't affect my purchase decision on this game, it looks to inspired for me to be deswayed by simple review opinons.

[QUOTE="brianBeezy"]

[QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

that's a very close up shot...also this does look on par:

mD-

Killzone 2 open scene vs Halo Reach open scene, happy now? This should pretty much end the argument as well

vs

Reach isn't even out yet... it has the potential to look a little bit better and both of those gifs aren't even opening scenes... Man, level 4 posters...

I didn't create this thread, I just joined in the discussion...Man, Level 20 posters....

[QUOTE="brianBeezy"]

[QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

how is that silly? The guns look almost the same detail wiseand the textures are also quite similar.

BURSTIIIFIRE

Seriously?

that's a very close up shot...also this does look on par:

Killzone 2 open scene vs Halo Reach open scene, happy now? This should pretty much end the argument as well

vs

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]The thing about KZ2 graphics is that the guns don't look as good, the fire-explosions aren't that detailed, it's very linear, and the textures can look bad at some spots. Reach on the other hand has way better gun models, a lot more detail in the explosion-water-armor effects, better textures, huge open environments, and looks a lot more crisp. And it uses a helluva lot more color, though that has nothing to do with the technical part. KZ2 just looks absolutely beautiful when running is full motion because of all the different tricks the game engine uses. Both have fantastic lighting and animations, but have different ****. I think Reach and KZ2 both look great in their own ways, but KZ2 edges it out.-RocBoys9489-

How can you blaim them?

look at your first sentence>>>>

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

see the BETA is pretty much on par with that..

BURSTIIIFIRE

Say what?! That's just silly lol.

how is that silly? The guns look almost the same detail wiseand the textures are also quite similar.

Seriously?

[QUOTE="brianBeezy"]

[QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

Come on dude...do you have to be such a big fanboy? A 3 hour game...really? Do you actually think that's true?

BURSTIIIFIRE

to be fair, what you said about PS3 games being linear compaired to xbox360 games isn't true or fair either. If he is being a big fanboy maybe hes trying to make eqaully unfair and untrue comments about 360 and halo to match the fanboy comments you've already made regarding the PS3 and it's exclusives?

Why would you expect someone to play a fair if you're already cheating in the game?

So you are telling me that KZ2 and GoW 3 are not linear?

Dude every game this gen is linear except Just Cause 2 if you want to put on the fanboy goggles.