[QUOTE="coolkid93"]If it comes it comes. Sure XBL has it but it's not that important. At least PSN is free. XBL isn't worth $50. That's all that they give you for gold? If I'm missing something then please tell me. You already pay $60 so you're going to charge me to play online also? They call ps3 owners "cows" but when M$ is the one who's really milking people. rp108

Well they say ignorance is bliss.

So, He's ignorant because he'd reather not waste his money on something he could get free or at a better valuse rather then trying to justify the worth of his purchase to everyone else for some small feature that isn't even relavent to the game experience itself? Ok.

I'd love for you to explain what he said in his post makes you think he's so ignorant. Really, just curious to see how you came to this conclusion based on what he said. Maybe I'm just not seeing it.

don't know if it matters but some people were saying it, found this

This looks better then u2.

slipknot0129

Alan wake looks just as good as uncharted 2, as does Conviction,REGARDLESS of how much cows try to deny it. And to 360 owners, dont let cows bully you, they cant have every graphics king.

SolarEclipze

Oh maybe UC2 is the best looking game SO FAR because SC: Conviction isn't even OUT YET.93soccer

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27051279

It's really more of a preference thing than anything else. If you do not like some 360 games, then that is your personal feelings. There is nothing wrong with it. However, if you bash the exclusives and promote other exclusives found on other systems at the same time, then that will make you a fanboy.

Valiant_Rebel

unless what you see as a bash is actually objective criticism based on a consitant line of prefrences typical of that person.

Example:

If someone makes negative comment about not Killzone 2 on PS3 because of blur, but also dislikes or makes negaive comments for Alan Wake for the same = not a bash, just his personal prefreces.

A bash is only ture if the person make a negative comment on a game that is inconsitant with his previous prefrences and dislikes has displayed:

Example:

If someone says they don't like Gears of War on xbox360 because it's linear but praisepraise Uncharted 2 on PS3 and not mention or totally disregarding the fact it is also a linear game = bash, fanboy, bias

A fanboy is one who portrays blind devotion to a specific company. Stevo_the_gamer

the problem with your definiton is that FANBOYS usually use those words you have in bold to bash other people because of their own fanboyism. Saying someoneis "blind" to something usually indicates an illgical bias on the part of the person making the comment.

I've seen people on here use the phrase blind devotion beforee and in ALL cases it was obvious that the person making the comment was blindly devoted. This is simply because I don't see unbiasd and rational posters making accusations of other people being "blindy devoted" because they like one console or another.

How can someone know if devotion is "blind"? Careful how youanswer because it could expose your own bias.

Fanboy:

*A person who has an irrational bias and twists logic and facts in order to create the illusion that the product he favors is better than another competing product.*

In thecase for system wars the "product/s" are video game consoles and the games released on them.

The key phrases/words that matter the mostin the definition of fanboy are: irrational bias / Twist logic and facts / illusion.

[QUOTE="Alan_Boring"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

No. I have PS3 though, but if I didnt FF would not make me want one.

Fizzman

I dont care, what the game is called FFVersus or FF13, I would not buy a system because of one JRPG. Umm Last time I checked the "REAL" FF is the one that actually continues series, 1,2,3,4,5 unless FF Crystal Chronicles is THE REAL FF. Wouldnt get Final Fantasy Versus and a PS3 if it got a 20/10 on gamespot.

*looks at sig*

Xbox Live Gamertag- Fizzman117

PSN Tag- Fizzman117

---------------------------------

hmm cant put my finger on it but somethings not quite right here...

[QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

Omg pc is not Superior. You cant include onld games cause thats b/c and weh have to include ps2 games on b/c ps3s and xbox on 360s. Its all opinion. Saying PC is better and any other opinion is false is talk of a fanboy.

GeneralShowzer

*pops in MGS3 into playstation 3 and plays it*

Hmm,me think you shouldn't make comments about something you're obviously uninformed about. I definatly can play PS2 titles on a PS3, and PS1 titles too.

ps2 was more powerfull than dreamcast in terms of doing things more than once.

dreamcast games looked pretty on paper but in motion they didnt look and feel as good as ps2 games.

btw, GOW2 > anything on Dreamcast

ZoomZoom2490

MGS2, MGS3, SoTC, GT4 sure but DC only produced game for 2 years in the states 1999-2000. let's go back and try some games from that time frame and see how DC stands up. and what year did GOW 2 come out in again?

all games no later than 2000 say hello

[QUOTE="Crossel777"]

I wonder if the PS2 at the time could even handle Shenmue 1&2.

hakanakumono

Uhm, obviously yes? We're talking about the difference between 1998 hardware and 2000 hardware.

Actually Shenmue 2 on xbox dosn't really look any better than Shenmue 2 on Dreamcast--a testiment to dreamcast's true power, having played the game on both...I think it looked better on Dreamcast. No one knows what Dreamcast would have been able to do given more time. Soul Calubur DC still looks more amazing than Tekken tag or even 4 on PS2, maybe five is a bit better, maybe.

direct comparison between Shenmue 2 on DC vs xbox (the system said be stonger than PS2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRLKGZxUNDM