[QUOTE="supermanfarr"]I have a ps60, I guess when you have both your not blind to fanboyism.. So far the ps3 is a disapiontment. Everyhind I got it for has turned to trash. RFOM is lame after playing gears first. Sigma is great but I love ninja gaiden,{original xbox ninja fan}. Warhawk the best game out is gimped by online servers shutting down and the stats not recordind. The whole point is to get points and level up. Sometimes I have great games and sometimes not. My great game have not been recorded.
Everything the ps3 has done sucks. I rented lair today it sucks. There comes a point when I have to belive the haters and say, your right the ps3 does suck. Every multiplate is better on 360. 360 has better games and better games are coming out. I dont belive any hype for any ps3 games any more they have all floped. If you want my ps3 it will be on craigs list for sale. One game mgs4 the way things are going it will flop or have frame rate issues Belive i ps3 sucks..Magical_Zebra

They say DIRT for the PS3 is better than the 360 version....... :shock:

If Ign says it's superior then great, dont forget Skate looks better on the ps3 as well!!bigLLL

[QUOTE="GarchomPro"]Another PS3 superior Multiplat.Truth_Hurts_U

Losing objects in the game. Like trees, grass, blocks, and so on. For a smoother frame rate makes it Superior? I think it would make it the dumbed down version.

[QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="InsaneBasura"]

[QUOTE="pintabear49blue"]the way death happens is what truly ruins it. it is to easy and lacks any real challenge because of it. this is the same thing that happend to prey and lego star wars. why did they decide to do this do you think.? InsaneBasura

That would be one viable point you do have. I haven't played the game yet, so I can't speak from experience, but I think the least they should have done is erase your progress. Basically use the vita-chambers as standard checkpoints, rather than the extra lives they now appear to be. It really does sound like it allows you to cheat the game.

The reason why they implemented this system I believe is spelled "casual gamers". Irrational wanted everyone to enjoy the game with as few annoyances as possible. Certain people are stupid, can't/don't want to learn to play the game properly or just plain suck, so they die a lot. My guess is Irrational wanted to account for that.

Also, lolz at your Zelda comparisons. Zelda feel? Bioshock? lol

That would be an uncool thing. Big Daddy's are supposed to be tough and intimidating so you have to think twice about messing with him or the Little Sister. Or think smart by deploying clever tactics and whatnot. But no, instead you can just run up to him and beat him to death with a wrench... It cheapens the whole experience and removes tension and challenge. It seems counterproductive to the design of the game. I actually would really like to hear Ken Levine's explanation for implementing it.

[QUOTE="pintabear49blue"]the way death happens is what truly ruins it. it is to easy and lacks any real challenge because of it. this is the same thing that happend to prey and lego star wars. why did they decide to do this do you think.? InsaneBasura

That would be one viable point you do have. I haven't played the game yet, so I can't speak from experience, but I think the least they should have done is erase your progress. Basically use the vita-chambers as standard checkpoints, rather than the extra lives they now appear to be. It really does sound like it allows you to cheat the game.

The reason why they implemented this system I believe is spelled "casual gamers". Irrational wanted everyone to enjoy the game with as few annoyances as possible. Certain people are stupid, can't/don't want to learn to play the game properly or just plain suck, so they die a lot. My guess is Irrational wanted to account for that.

Also, lolz at your Zelda comparisons. Zelda feel? Bioshock? lol