pc will always be compatible with early games due to mods and patches and i'm not saying people don't play older games. I was mainly talking about consoles.i still play games on pc from the 90s, thats why
wis3boi
ceelogic's forum posts
[QUOTE="ceelogic"]For all we know this next zelda could have all those....Link has always had facial expressionsSuperFlakeman
Really? You think a Zelda game will feature real life buildings and cities like MW3's apocalyptic NY? Photo realistic expressions as the ones in LA Noire? Uncharted 3's hollywood set pieces? Did you see the demo of Mass Effect 3? That was just a cluster**** for my mind. Explosions right and left, it's like the explosions and fires where functioning as walls... like WTF is that???
No man Nintendo games are not like that. Did you see New SMB Mii? It's a Wii U game. It looks exactly like New SMB Wii, but it's cleaner and sharper. There are no explosion or real life humans in the game just because it's in HD.
Now that doesn't mean Zelda HD won't have its own fancy special effects like that spider falling down a crumbling floor, that's fine because it's small scale stuff, not like MW3's apocalypse with burning skyscrapes, detonating megaton bombs right in the middle of the city, collapsing buildings, friggin sub marines, large ships, helicopters. Get that **** out of here. I'm done with dudebro games.
Basically what I'm looking for are games like Ratchet, Rayman and Sonic, but the PS3 and 360 don't nearly satisfy me in that regard. Wii U can't come soon enough.
I think think next zelda will have a dark tone, who's to say that we couldn't see destruction in the land of hyrule. Magic exist in the world so explosions are possible.Link visits many temples in every zelda so why could one of the temples have an abandoned city with collapsed buildings were where only husk of hylians guard some ancient secret. Hell a new evil could plague the land and gannon could appear to be a wizard guiding Link to recover these artifats from the temple only to betray link once the evil is vanquished,ending the game with one epic battle that you never saw coming. my point is anything is possible if nintendo would just think outside the box.....oh and the next Zelda will have voice acting and be a more cinematic adventure.When ever a new gen arrives I always hear people saying it better havebackwards compatibility. Shouldn't the new systems focus on the future of gaming. I wonder how many people actually used the feature this gen anyway. Only early adopters of the ps3 have the option and 360 can only play games that are listed as compatible. Now with the release of HD remakes I think that backwards compatibility will end with this gen, why give you something for free when they could release the game at a higher rez and make you buy it again.
[QUOTE="g0ddyX"]
And I doubt Zelda would be as technical or as graphical as games we have today.
SuperFlakeman
This is a proper video game graphically. High res. Vibrant. Clean. Pure. No fancy collapsing buildings, explosions or facial animation.
For all we know this next zelda could have all those....Link has always had facial expressionsDeep down you know you agree :P
Anyone who dislikes Wind Waker does not have a soul. Forcing me to use the sail boat and fish for tri force pieces is why i hated the game. Admit it people the art direction of zelda could be stick figures and you would still run out and buy it in droves.Because appealing to a wider fanbase equals more money. Oh yeah, because appealing to an M rated audience worked SO well every time Nintendo did it. :roll:[QUOTE="ceelogic"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]why should they? seriously, give me one reason they should do it. just. one.nintendoboy16
Oh wait, IT ONLY WORKED 1/3 of the time. The other 2/3, they failed.
So wouldn't that just label them as quiters. It is possible for a game that appeals to an older audience without having blood, gore and guns. Story is the first place to start, plus nintendo is moving into the HD era now is the time to do it.[QUOTE="ceelogic"]I kinda quit the Witther 2 around the part with the ghost battlefield. The game made alot of refrences to the first one so I will play it first then go back. But skyrims had a better sense of exploration and had me hooked dispite the bugs. SKYRIM>>>the witcher 2lightleggyreally? I felt it had minimum references...after all there are not even any returning characters from 1 except for triss and dandelion. then why were those guys apoligizing for trying to rape him at the begining and who was the girl from all the flashback cut scenes. the characters i met all seemed like they all had a long history with geralt so i thought most were from the first game
why should they? seriously, give me one reason they should do it. just. one.BrunoBRSBecause appealing to a wider fanbase equals more money.
Log in to comment