cfisher2833's forum posts

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@Kevlar101 said:

Since GlitchSpot is finally driving me away with all of this bugged out reviews business, I want to go to a different website. Being able to write my own reviews is the only thing that has kept me here so long. But, now it's fucked.

Anyway, do you know of any other "at least moderately well-known" gaming websites that allow for user reviews like GameSpot does? (and does it allow for pictures to be posted in said reviews?)

Well there's Steam, but I don't think you can include pics in your Steam reviews.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@clyde46 said:

@GoldenElementXL said:

@clyde46 said:

@scatteh316 said:

@jun_aka_pekto said:

@scatteh316 said:

What a waste of money, you could of had 3x 6Gb 780 TI's for the same money.

He he. I don't think he's too concerned about money. Not right now, anyway.

He is else he would of bought 3 Titan Blacks, if he's interested in pure performance then 3x 6Gb 780 TI's would of been much much better.

There aren't any 6GB 780 Ti's. Nividia is dumb but not that dumb.

They aren't coming. As soon as that was confirmed I decided to go Titan Black SC's.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1475993/evga-step-up-your-gtx-780-to-6gb-update-6gb-gtx-780-ti-cancelled/1000

What coolers do those have? I'm looking to replace my 780Ti with two of those Titan Blacks.

I don't think there are any aftermarket coolers for Titans, Titan Blacks, or Titan Z--just the stock Nvidia cooler (which is a pretty fucking good cooler to begin with). Think Nvidia requires third parties to use its cooler design for whatever reason.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@GoldenElementXL said:

@clyde46 said:

@scatteh316 said:

@jun_aka_pekto said:

@scatteh316 said:

What a waste of money, you could of had 3x 6Gb 780 TI's for the same money.

He he. I don't think he's too concerned about money. Not right now, anyway.

He is else he would of bought 3 Titan Blacks, if he's interested in pure performance then 3x 6Gb 780 TI's would of been much much better.

There aren't any 6GB 780 Ti's. Nividia is dumb but not that dumb.

They aren't coming. As soon as that was confirmed I decided to go Titan Black SC's.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1475993/evga-step-up-your-gtx-780-to-6gb-update-6gb-gtx-780-ti-cancelled/1000

Yeah, but they are still going through with 6gb 780s, which are pretty much just as good as 780tis (any differences can probably be overcome with overclocking): Newegg Amazon has ten left here

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@GoldenElementXL said:

@leandrro said:

@GoldenElementXL said:

@leandrro said:

i get this same frame hate on 1080p with my 400 dollar pc, its a source engine game and it looks like a 2006's game

No you don't. You need a video card with 3GB of ram to run insane textures. And judging by the overall cost of your machine you don't have one. And with "high" textures you need a GTX 760 or a r9 270x to hit a close to steady 60fps at 1080p. And once again if your rig is $400, you don't have either of those. Nice try though.

my textures are on very high not high, you only need 3gb for insane textures

my U$400 PC has a HD7870

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naO0daBZeRo

Thats strange, Benchmarks with a 7870 and a much better CPU only gets 42 fps. And in that youtube video the only time you were above 50fps in BF4 was when you were in menus. Even adding the 10fps you spent most of your time sub 50. I'm not knocking your rig or anything, just your claims that a $400 PC can max games at 1080p/60fps. Your evidence even proves otherwise.

That's because they're using MSAA 4X. Just turn it down a bit and you can very easily achieve 60fps in Titanfall with a 7870.I know as I was able to as well. Although personally I prefer to simply use an SMAA injector and combine it with the in-game AA. MSAA can be somewhat shitty at times.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@gpuking said:

Infamous SS

Isn't this game set in Seattle? Why does no one ever post a shot when it's raining? I see shots with water on the ground, but no one has had one where it's raining. Wasn't it supposed to have some interesting puddle formation effect or something?

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@epiccommando said:

how are all you folks doin? I'm looking for some good tactical shooters for the xbox and ps2. I'm kinda tired of the run and gun MMS bullshit. I'm looking for an fps or tps that has to take some brains to get through. It doesn't have to be squad based. The game doesn't have to have a modern theme either. I'm looking for realistic gunplay, branching paths, (if it's squad based) good squad A.I. and commands, open or QCB warfare, and a realistic damage system (meaning it only takes a few shots to drop your ass). A lean mechanic would also be nice, but it's not needed. I'd appreciate all of your feedback.

The XBOX and PS2 really aren't the place to look for these sort of games. What you really need is PC.

Swat 4 (probably the best tactical FPS ever, designed by none other than Ken Levine and his team at Irrational), released only on PC in 2005

Loading Video...

Rainbow Six 3 Gold Edition (features the Athena Sword expansion)

Loading Video...

While Rainbow Six 3 was also released on the XBOX, the PC version is considerably deeper, with larger levels, a map editor thing that lets you plot out every move your team makes, and I believe it also has more team controls than its console counterparts.

The games aren't hard to run btw.

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

Link

Not only is the guy (17yo btw) making a game, but he's doing the music for it as well...and it's pretty fucking good imo. The only thing I disliked was the falsetto vocals (and mainly because I think his regular vocals were just so much better).

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

Natural Selection 2

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries said:

Which current or upcoming games would you brand as:

  • tessellation king
  • particle king

???

Honest opinions only.

Metro LL wins in terms of tessellation imo. I haven't seen anything that really compares to it.

Particles....I don't know, Warframe with PhysX?

Loading Video...

Avatar image for cfisher2833
cfisher2833

2150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By cfisher2833
Member since 2011 • 2150 Posts

The gameplay itself looked fun and all...but damn, no wonder Kojima was worried GTAV would show him up. Graphically, the game definitely isn't looking that hot. Poor anisotropic filtering (seriously, wtf is with next gen console games still not having this?), low res textures, blocky geometry, and some goofy looking vegetation. Should be a good game though, and at least they're staying at 60fps. That Jack Bauer Snake voice is really odd though.

The ability to simply float enemies off into the sky is a poor choice imo. It works too well. Dead/knocked out bodies should be hidden, not simply floated away in some ridiculous, magical manner. If they made it so you could only do it in an area where enemies weren't likely to spot the floating bodies, that'd be one thing, but as is, it's just too god-like and cheap.