[QUOTE="darkmagician06"]dont ignore my post OP admit the voice recognition has potential :cry:mario_gamer

you do know voice recognition's been around for ages right.....e.g. check out End War it's not exactly cutting edge tech

lol true all nintendoo were concerned about was ways to make more money....

Their conference almost made me miss the Sony one by putting me to sleep...thank goodness for metroid at the end!!!

they port a DS mario game to wii and get applause 4D, 15 years, only now do they have the technology for 4 players....huh???? that was the most anti climatic thing ever!

[QUOTE="cheapness1"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Nordquist"]

I thought Microsoft's was the best. Full motion capture, voice/face recognition + AI are > Wii Mote & Sony Wand

Mr_Nordquist

full body capture was cool...but for fps, rts, etc. (like sony demoed) i don't see how it'd work

voice recognition.......thats in end war now?!? not exactly the most advanced tech

AI was pure programming for a tech demo not a game...

IMO sony's was the best showing for actual games....but MS was the best for wow factor

plus pulling the 2 engineers from their secret basement was kinda funny

Did you not see in MS's tech demo when they showed being able to reach your hand out in front of you, and touch the screen (not literally)? That solves RTS problems. For FPS it'd be just like Sony. You scan an item in (Something Sony's product can't do, but Microsoft's can), and use that. I'm sure Microsoft will release some sort of trigger for FPS games for that purpose. I mean even just imagine being able to draw your own artwork, and scan that into a game for use as a weapon/armor/car paint/custom character models/etc. Microsoft's camera blows every other piece of technology out of the water.

I also added voice recognition based on the fact that neither the Wii Mote, or Sony Wand do that.

AI was pure programming, and as such any game programmer can program that in.

PSeye is capable of the scanning, was shown in a tank tech demo a while ago where objects were used to construct tanks should be on google or something

Plus remember that it was only a "vision" they show'd you not actual use of the technology whereas the PSeye apps are actual prototypes

If microsoft starts releasing peripherals ninty style it defeats the whole point they were trying to get across

Sony Wand works in conjunction with the PSeye which has a built in mic hence making voice recognition viable for the playstation but not the wii without wii chat

all in all i think the wii is gonna be losing at its own game by the end of next year lol

I thought Microsoft's was the best. Full motion capture, voice/face recognition + AI are > Wii Mote & Sony Wand

Mr_Nordquist

full body capture was cool...but for fps, rts, etc. (like sony demoed) i don't see how it'd work

voice recognition.......thats in end war now?!? not exactly the most advanced tech

AI was pure programming for a tech demo not a game...

IMO sony's was the best showing for actual games....but MS was the best for wow factor

plus pulling the 2 engineers from their secret basement was kinda funny

well like they said in the PS conference sometimes you need a button to e.g. pull a gun trigger

so in terms of games PS is cool....in terms of impressive "vision" MS wins

Mine's still in itz box to be sent for repairs, been there over a year now lol!!!!

I got another one and just switched the HDD (I don't use Live), plus I got a Ps3/PC so I pretty much use the xbox for 360 exclusives only now, just in case ;)

no, because its a racing game, and because of that renders a whole lot less than any other game, so of course its natrually gonna look better. and for that reason, racing games are never considered for best graphics, just like RTS's.

cobrax75

Then again if you consider GT is running physics and AI for each car on-screen and goes up to 16 cars per race one could argue it's doing about the same if not more processing than Gears of War...

[QUOTE="Disturbed123"]

[QUOTE="AdoringFan_"]

If it was, I wouldn't have posted it :|

AdoringFan_

Then maybe you should post a shot from the actual game and not the first teaser trailer picture then?

And how am I suppose to know this? I'm not a fan of racers but I was curious to see on what people think of the graphics. ;)

Dude if you took 5 seconds to look at screenshots on gamespot you would a) know you put up promo pics b) have beenable to answer your own question!

I'll just say the focus in Forza 2 definately wasn't on the graphics!

Plus if those screens you posted are meant to be comparative then you should put in-game screenshots not promo ones...

honestly looks like RE4 to me...