@chemstrike: none of that is relevant. Actually this whole thing is irrelevant to the topic. But you don't have many posts left for the day do you?
It turns it into a Nintendo VS Xbox thread which makes it more relevant to System Wars.
Forum Posts | Following | Followers |
---|---|---|
63 | 4 | 0 |
@chemstrike: none of that is relevant. Actually this whole thing is irrelevant to the topic. But you don't have many posts left for the day do you?
It turns it into a Nintendo VS Xbox thread which makes it more relevant to System Wars.
@chemstrike: it just seemed odd.
I don't really care what Microsoft did. Tomb raider is not now an exclusive franchise. The rules cited in this thread have made that clear. There is nothing more to discuss
If there's nothing more to discuss then you can just ignore me.
From a gamespot article:
In the wake of Microsoft's Tomb Raider Xbox exclusivity deal, PlayStation EU executive Jim Ryan said in a media interview that Sony doesn't need to buy exclusives.
What is your take on Microsoft making Rise of the Tomb Raider an Xbox-exclusive, even if it's only a timed-exclusive? Let us know in the comments below!
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/microsoft-says-tomb-raider-xbox-exclusivity-is-a-w/1100-6421784/
@chemstrike: I'm saying it's a multiplat, as do the rules cited by the user earlier
It's xbox exclusive. MS didn't spend millions for you to speak as if it's a regular old multiplat.
@chemstrike: why is there all of a sudden 3 new accounts all in one thread named after shit from COD?
Why do you care?
@dropshott: also known as a multiplat. I don't know what your issue is
A game that can only be played on xbox for at least the first 6 months.
Don't see how that changes anything. How many posts do you have today?
So you're saying there's no difference between being on xbox, ps and pc and just being on xbox?
You should have contacted MS before they wasted millions on timed exclusivity.
@ps4hasnogames: I don't understand why? Can't a game be 600 FPS and still not be fast paced?
You know in best buy when they have those videos playing to show the tv quality, they show birds and shit and the ocean. Yes it looks fluid and realistic but it doesn't have that movie feel, for some reason I don't know why but MOST movies look better at 24 fps. I don't know why but they just look like movies, it has a sort of feel to them. Like Skyfall for instance, I turned on my tv to double the fps and it looked more fluid and stuff but it also looked like someone was acting in it, hard to explain, it looked like someone being fake on camera. But in 24 fps you lose yourself in the movie, it looks like a movie, it doesn't look like actors being fake on camera.
The same goes for certain genres of games, IF DONE RIGHT 30 fps feels like your inside a movie, it has a movie theater presentation to it. But for fast paced twitch games like Bayonetta 2, Call of Duty, SSB, 60 fps looks and plays better.
I wonder what peoples reaction would be if it were the opposite and movies were at 60 fps and then someone released a film at 24 fps.
High fps is more immersive because it's more realistic. Feeling like you're there should be scarier than feeling like you're watching a movie.
The reason movies are 24 fps is because it's cheaper.
right, so the franchise isn't exclusive
Bad reading comprehension or just trolling?
it's not an exclusive franchise
You don't know that the next installment after Rise of the Tomb Raider will be Xbox exclusive or not.
Uh neither do you. Also you really want to go all SW rules about this? Because if you would have read just below that you'd see that you're wrong. The franchise is not now exclusive
"just because a game is Xbox One and Xbox 360, or PS3, PS4 and PSVita does not mean they are "exclusive." They are considered multiplatform games"
You got one post left, spend it wisely.
It's xbox exclusive plain and simple.
right, so the franchise isn't exclusive
Bad reading comprehension or just trolling?
it's not an exclusive franchise
You don't know that the next installment after Rise of the Tomb Raider will be Xbox exclusive or not.
uh, yeah they are. One is a now a Nintendo exclusive and the other is an now an Xbox timed exclusive.
...in other words one is a multiplat
right, so the franchise isn't exclusive
Bad reading comprehension or just trolling?
How did this get an 8?
I've been watching some vids and the game looks extremely easy, the dev decided to go lazy with the AI by not implementing difficulty levels and somehow tried to masked that off as accessibility for people wanting a lighter Dark Souls.
Go and read the Eurogamer review, it reads like a 5 the entire time but somehow ended up with a 7.
In most games I play the ai and difficulty are quite separate and that's the way it should be.
Difficulty is usually about the damage dealt and received ratio.
Why not? Since both franchises are now exclusive.
uh, no they're not
uh, yeah they are. One is a now a Nintendo exclusive and the other is an now an Xbox timed exclusive.
...in other words one is a multiplat
Log in to comment