@At3fD And I'm sure the X1 will not allow you to add your account to as many of your friend's as possible. No doubt there will be a limitation on it as well.
@At3fD I hope you enjoy getting proven wrong, but a feature like this IS NOT new. Currently, Sony allows you to authorize a limited number of PS3 consoles with access to one account. Basically, I can log in to a friend's ps3 with my account, and he will then have access to my games as well. Also my PS+ membership. A feature which I'm sure will be added to the PS4. This was made available to the PS3 at it's launch date. Sorry, Microsoft copies another one from Sony! I'm not a fanboy, and I do hope the Xbox does well, but I just find it funny that when Microsoft brings something out, uninformed people have no idea that Sony already implemented the feature YEARS ago. (ie. Motion Control gaming with the Eyetoy, had online play before the Xbox, things like that)
@xiiraveniix @clynch0527 I think we have enough information now though, to know sony is going to do the right thing by the PS4. They admitted to their mistakes with the PS3 and so far have delivered everything a gamer needs in a console. Not a bunch of useless extra features that less than 30% of its customer base will use. What do you think of the comment by Yoshida made in response to the guy asking about changing his name?..."That's people's favorite question that I do not answer." Maybe this time around, we will have the ability?
This may or may not sound bad, but I do think a lot will agree. Sony should really stop specifying things like this. Especially if the X1 is doing something people are against, Sony should not announce they are doing the opposite. I know they are trying to get people to like their console, but if they didn't say it, then Microsoft wouldn't turn around and change their policies. The used game and always online feature was a different story. That HAD to be said. But small features like this, I kind of wish they would keep secret until like a week, or days before the release, giving Microsoft no time to change it without having to release a firmware update or something later down the road.
@GuPesci @VeeArSick @clynch0527 Yes. specs shouldn;t matter in any generation war. Its like PC is definitely better graphically, but there are alot of games that outsell games like CoD and crysis that are graphically challenged. Look at Minecraft for example.
@VeeArSick @clynch0527 They have different voltages and different uses, yes, but they perform the same type of operations in terms of communication between the system
@VeeArSick @clynch0527 i know that, everyone knows that, why do you feel you have to specify that? did i say anything remotely about the ps4 and x1? no. the G in GDDR stands for graphics, meaning it is specifically for grahics, but the DDR part, works the same as your typical SDRAM. I just didnt specify the graphical part.
@GuPesci @VeeArSick it also depends alot on how well the software is utilizing the ram. if you leave them both factory clocked, ddr5 is alot better. you can overclock ddr3 to be comparable to ddr5
@GuPesci @clynch0527 the latency, as in the speed in which it will render and handle textures. the ram you have, the faster it will be able to process everything. Lower more efficient latency means it will communicate between the GPU, CPU and the entire system faster. GDDR 3 can perform very well, but it would take like 4 gigs of DDR3, to perform as well as say 2 gigs of DDR5 (thats not a definite accuracy, just a way of saying how much better it actually is)
clynch0527's comments