[QUOTE="Couth_"][QUOTE="James161324"]
I don't think it changes anything. I don't think any company is going to reverse a 9 thousand dollar charge after a end user gave out there infomation. I know know there terms of service but i'm pretty sure they aren't liable for an issue were the end user is this stupid, and rightly so.
1. He gave out his credit card infomation to his friend to supposedly use, thats one of the biggest stuipdiest moves in the book.
2. He has no hard evidence proving that any of this happened.
3. His and his friend supposedly agreed to one deal and his friend payed in cash. Why do crimals use cash, becuase it can't be traced.
Unless you have some hard evidence you can pull out of no were, in my opinion, your pretty much screwed. While i would still reccomend consulting with a laywer. But from the infomation i have seen you don't have a fraud case as you willingly gave out your credit card and allowed him to use it. And a court case i don't see any evidence or really anything that adds up. Your not going to a win a 9 thousand dollar lawsuit based on an witness, and a text message that says next to nothing.
worlock77
Doesn't matter. They are unauthorized. The bank will have his back. I work at a bank and people come in all the time to file claims when they knowingly let family members use their cards. They try to dupe the bank out of some extra cash. We gladly help the and let them know when the person is found they will be prosecuted. When we let them know that tid bit they herp derp back out. If OP is going to take his friend to court, he might as well let the bank handle it. And they will return his money immediately, no interest.He's waited 7 months. I really don't think the bank is going to have his back now. If he wanted to claim unauthorized usage he should have done so ass soon as the charges came up. Waiting all this time he's given implicit authorization to the charges.
Exactly. The only way that works is if it's done within a few days of when the charges are made.
Log in to comment