cpo335's forum posts

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="Samwel_X"][QUOTE="I_pWnzz_YoU"]

I edited the head part out since Im not entirely sure he hit her twice in the head. And, "to disable her from attacking" what could a 15 year old girl do to a 30-some beefcake? I don't care if it was assault or not, he could've just restrained her like a good cop would've. All the violence wasn't necessary.

And that is reinforced when he (probably) is checking for blood in the cell at the end of the video. He knows what he has done is wrong and reprehensible and so he checks he hasn't left any tracks in the cell without remembering the cells camera.

Or he is checking (maybe) for blood because he doesn't want blood in the room?
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts

[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="I_pWnzz_YoU"] Do you have proof that the shoe hit him? Even if it did, does that mean he can kick her, pin her down and punch her several times in the head rather than just cuffing her?I_pWnzz_YoU

First, stop using punching her in the head as an arguement. He did it once (unless you can definitly prove that he did it on the ground, which you can't. I already proved you wrong). And it doesn't matter if the shoe hit him, If I throw something at you, but it misses, COULD YOU SUE ME? YES! Also, he is a police officer, you don't do that to a cop. I agree that kicking her was a little unprofessional (actually I thought it was just down right wierd), but everything else was done to restraint her. Punching her dazed her, he threw her against the wall to disable her from attacking him, she was on the ground to be hand cuffed.

I edited the head part out since Im not entirely sure he hit her twice in the head. And, "to disable her from attacking" what could a 15 year old girl do to a 30-some beefcake? I don't care if it was assault or not, he could've just restrained her like a good cop would've. All the violence wasn't necessary.

She could have clawed his eyes out with her long finger nails. I don't know what she could have done, and NIETHER DID HE. That is why all criminals are treated the same at first, no one knows what they are capable of.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="I_pWnzz_YoU"] If shoes are deadly weapons, does that mean we could be charged with "Possession of a deadly weapon if we wear shoes?I_pWnzz_YoU
You guys really like to pick and choose your arguements don't you? I said that it would be argueable that they are a deadly weapon. Even if you take that part out, I still have a case. She assaulted him, she is therefore a criminal. Game over.

Do you have proof that the shoe hit him? Even if it did, does that mean he can kick her, pin her down and punch her several times in the head rather than just cuffing her?

First, stop using punching her in the head as an arguement. He did it once (unless you can definitly prove that he did it on the ground, which you can't. I already proved you wrong). And it doesn't matter if the shoe hit him, If I throw something at you, but it misses, COULD YOU SUE ME? YES! Also, he is a police officer, you don't do that to a cop. I agree that kicking her was a little unprofessional (actually I thought it was just down right wierd), but everything else was done to restraint her. Punching her dazed her, he threw her against the wall to disable her from attacking him, she was on the ground to be hand cuffed.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="HeyDoYaThang"]Two grown men beating a little girl? You are ok with cops doing that to teach someone respect? Are you insane?clicketyclick
Yes, I am fine with two police officers teaching a law-breaking piece of scum some respect.

How do you know she broke the law?

She kind of flung her shoe at him...
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="I_pWnzz_YoU"] What if she wasn't a criminal and she flicked her shoe because she felt it was unfair to be there? (Someone posted something like this)I_pWnzz_YoU
Sh still flicked her shoe at him. That is assault (with a deadly weapon - arguable). That is a criminal act. Also, if she was giving him attitude, then you could also call that harassment (also argueable).

If shoes are deadly weapons, does that mean we could be charged with "Possession of a deadly weapon if we wear shoes?

You guys really like to pick and choose your arguements don't you? I said that it would be argueable that they are a deadly weapon. Even if you take that part out, I still have a case. She assaulted him, she is therefore a criminal. Game over.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="I_pWnzz_YoU"][QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"]

Because after she was restrained and unable to move the cop swung very wide and either hit her head or the floor. And judging by the fact that he swung a second time, I don't think he hit the floor.

Oh and the fact that his other arm was holding her shoulder so he probably didn't punch himself.

You still have reasonable doubt. You can't definitly say that he hit her head (on here anyways, you'd need to check her head in real life).So stop using that as an arguement.

Samwell, just stop being sarcastic. Once you participate in a criminal act, you are a criminal. UYou get the same treatment as everyone else.

What if she wasn't a criminal and she flicked her shoe because she felt it was unfair to be there? (Someone posted something like this)

Sh still flicked her shoe at him. That is assault (with a deadly weapon - arguable). That is a criminal act. Also, if she was giving him attitude, then you could also call that harassment (also argueable).
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Samwel_X"]

And how do you know they didn't provoke her outside of the cell door...

chesterocks7

Like how? Telling her to sit down and shut up?

Right because police never verbally abuse criminals.

And you're right, because no one ever verbally abuses police officers...
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts

[QUOTE="cpo335"]Like how? Telling her to sit down and shut up?Samwel_X

Waving their penises at her, calling her a c*** and saying they would shoot her husband or child and plant drugs on them.

I'm not saying any of that happened, but it could. You weren't there, you don't know, neither do I.

Pick something more realistic and be more realistic. The worse they could have done was call her a name, and judging by the foce she kicked her shoe at him, it doesn't look like they did much, if anything (and it doesn't matter if she didn't kick it hard, she still did it).
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"]

If you're that **** ignorant, you're beyond help. Hopefully someday something like this will happen to you and make you realize how **** stupid you are.

chesterocks7

It's called reasonable doubt. Learn something about the way a court system works, pal. Oh and how do you definitively know (I want 100% certaintly and if you can't give me that, then your arguement is nullified) that he hit her in the head?

Because after she was restrained and unable to move the cop swung very wide and either hit her head or the floor. And judging by the fact that he swung a second time, I don't think he hit the floor.

Oh and the fact that his other arm was holding her shoulder so he probably didn't punch himself.

You still have reasonable doubt. You can't definitly say that he hit her head (on here anyways, you'd need to check her head in real life).So stop using that as an arguement.

Samwell, just stop being sarcastic. Once you participate in a criminal act, you are a criminal. UYou get the same treatment as everyone else.

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts

[QUOTE="cpo335"]It's called reasonable doubt. Learn something about the way a court system works, pal. Oh and how do you definitively know (I want 100% certaintly and if you can't give me that, then your arguement is nullified) that he hit her in the head?Samwel_X

And how do you know they didn't provoke her outside of the cell door...

Like how? Telling her to sit down and shut up?