[QUOTE="Clinton015"][QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

Again way to lump all fighting forces in Iraq under the same "terrorist" umbrella.

I suppose Moqtadar Al Sadr's army who targetting specifically the US army would be justified in its decisions to do so, am I right? And no neither he nor his army carried out indiscriminate bombings against civilian populations.

Al Sadr's army do not have the support of the Iraqi people. Not nearly as much as the US does (since the Iraqis actually want a democratic government and work with the US more and more). What they do against the US, they do against the people they claim are trying to help.

And the Taliban in Afghanistan up to very recently focused primarily on the US army, one of the reasons why many Afghans support are beginning to show more support for the Taliban

Hoobinator

It is the job of the military to dispose of the Taliban because they are terrorists because they have attacked US citizens and have had tried to attack US citizens. Their lack of discrimination now makes them more fit to be terrorists.

Did you forget the reason the US attacked Afghanistan first? How was that a point at all?

:lol: Just goes to show how much the propaganda filled media has led you to believe.

The Taliban never attacked the US. It was not the Taliban who were behind 9/11. The Taliban were "supposedly" holding Al Qaeda operatives in the country and not handing them over. Why should the Taliban hand over whatever citizens the US deems to be terrorists to them.

List of Hijackers, most were Saudi Arabians, none were Afghan.

Liberal BS... as opposed to right wing BS. All media is BS. You can read my sig.

[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

Again way to lump all fighting forces in Iraq under the same "terrorist" umbrella.

I suppose Moqtadar Al Sadr's army who targetting specifically the US army would be justified in its decisions to do so, am I right? And no neither he nor his army carried out indiscriminate bombings against civilian populations.

Al Sadr's army do not have the support of the Iraqi people. Not nearly as much as the US does (since the Iraqis actually want a democratic government and work with the US more and more). What they do against the US, they do against the people they claim are trying to help.

And the Taliban in Afghanistan up to very recently focused primarily on the US army, one of the reasons why many Afghans support are beginning to show more support for the Taliban

Hoobinator

It is the job of the military to dispose of the Taliban because they are terrorists because they have attacked US citizens and have had tried to attack US citizens. Their lack of discrimination now makes them more fit to be terrorists.

Did you forget the reason the US attacked Afghanistan first? How was that a point at all?

:lol: Just goes to show how much the propaganda filled media has led you to believe.

The Taliban never attacked the US. It was not the Taliban who were behind 9/11. The Taliban were "supposedly" holding Al Qaeda operatives in the country and not handing them over. Why should the Taliban hand over whatever citizens the US deems to be terrorists to them.

List of Hijackers, most were Saudi Arabians, none were Afghan.

OK. Show me proof that the Taliban and Afghans were behind 9/11..... There isn't any.

But if you want, bring me proof. I've shown you who the Hijackers were and which countries they came from.

Oh and if you're not American, why do you care about us so much?

[QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

Again way to lump all fighting forces in Iraq under the same "terrorist" umbrella.

I suppose Moqtadar Al Sadr's army who targetting specifically the US army would be justified in its decisions to do so, am I right? And no neither he nor his army carried out indiscriminate bombings against civilian populations.

Al Sadr's army do not have the support of the Iraqi people. Not nearly as much as the US does (since the Iraqis actually want a democratic government and work with the US more and more). What they do against the US, they do against the people they claim are trying to help.

And the Taliban in Afghanistan up to very recently focused primarily on the US army, one of the reasons why many Afghans support are beginning to show more support for the Taliban

Hoobinator

It is the job of the military to dispose of the Taliban because they are terrorists because they have attacked US citizens and have had tried to attack US citizens. Their lack of discrimination now makes them more fit to be terrorists.

Did you forget the reason the US attacked Afghanistan first? How was that a point at all?

:lol: Just goes to show how much the propaganda filled media has led you to believe.

The Taliban never attacked the US. It was not the Taliban who were behind 9/11. The Taliban were "supposedly" holding Al Qaeda operatives in the country and not handing them over. Why should the Taliban hand over whatever citizens the US deems to be terrorists to them.

List of Hijackers, most were Saudi Arabians, none were Afghan.

No, I don't.

[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"]I am not actually Buddhist but I love Buddhism and try to apply it to my life when the thought comes to me. I find that a lot of Buddhist philosophies help me to become calmer and look at things as they are more accurately and maturely. I also think In Utero is one of the greatest albums of all time.Cerussite

But obviously I didn't as this topic is here.

Would you?

[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="AlternatingCaps"]

I hadn't really played many games this week. Obviously I didn't do it because I'm here. Plus, I had to read Lord of the Flies and I had a math test to study for.

I do believe I did well on it though.

AlternatingCaps

Hey! I'm not that far!

Crazy how Simon dies though

They burn the island and everyone dies. The Lord of the Flies becomes alive and eats all the children.