Both of these come after Starcraft 2 for me so I probably would go with Empire just because its not really in the Scifi genre and is a lot more different
[QUOTE="SamiRDuran"]i think dawn of war 2 and empire total war are stealing the show atm. no doubt starcraft 2 wil be a great game but imo blizzard is not the king of rts anymore. this credit goes to relic these days until blizzard decides to try sth new.GodLovesDead
Hardly. Relic is doing the same thing Blizzard is doing: improving a formula that works. Starcraft still has more players than all of Relic's game's combined, so Blizzard is still king in my book.
Idk, I put AoE 2 but now I'm realizing that age of empires 1 should have been my true answer..it was one of my first games and I loved it to death. Shame on me..
I'm still upset that they're going to sell the game 3 times for each faction.... They should of just went with their classic formula, all 3 campaigns in one game that's later expanded on by expansions. It sseems so unusual for blizzard.
capthavic
I like it. It means they can make the campains longer and deeper instead of trying to squeeze it all into one game.
Yeah I agree, I think its a good move now but as always only time will tell
[QUOTE="crazymaghie123"]I've played it and it is very fun. Most of the balancing/role switching will happen in beta anyways..they do have most people working on the single player but multiplayer is always being experimented with..Vuurk
How have you played it? The game is currently still in development and beta hasn't even started yet. Unless you meant Starcraft 1.
Log in to comment