deadlyabdus123's forum posts

Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
Topic: Do you guys agree? Oblivion was garbage to me even when it came out, so boring. Witcher 2 is much more fun, even with its flaws.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
I do... I dont want to waste 60 bucks on something that garbage. I never but anything that is at least 8.5 usually overall. Whenever I did, i tended to feel the suckyness of the game. Some people do enjoy crap. Sometimes I am fairly suprised tho, Infamous 2 was 7.5 here so I was disgusted that I bought it, i spit on my hand and slapped myself in the face. I hold sony exclusives to high regard so it mad me sick to have done that but infamous 2 so far has been good. Its the 2nd part of a game series, its not supposed to make dramatic improvements as it is to tell a story, and yes it will suck more than the first, it lost its edge and will not be as epic, its a interim tale no less. But I did not get KZ3 cause of a supposed short campaign and MP where people will stop playing in a year or so. So far my collection averages around 9.2 in rankings. I listen to critics cause they know whats best for me, when i stop is games I know I personally find boring, like fallout or oblivion but would be great experiences for people with patience.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="deadlyabdus123"]Instead of going on a rant like my other post, Ill ask you guys and then counter the argument. I feel all this COD hate going around the gaming community is alienating us from most gamers and fails in logical reasoning and would love to hear your thoughts. sami117

short and long

cause its rehash city,crappy engine,meh gameplay and animations that looked good last gen but now just look horid,robotic and generally reek of rehash.Not to mention an engine older than time itself.

Plus no dedicated servers

Now that I agree with, Lag and lack of servers kill COD, but servers cost money to maintain. The engine can only do so much at 60fps. Remember BF3 plays at 30 on consoles. And as far as map packs, BC2 allows you to unlock guns youd have to work for for 10 bucks, hows that for imbalance?
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
Ive played BO and MW2. BO doesnt really do anything to change it up. The game was boring to me since it plays exactly the same to MW2 and most of the "new" multiplayer modes I have played many many times before.

Remember, treyarch is Scum, what i wont do if i ever get my hands on the developers, MW1- MW2 I found as a big improvement. The problem is it was unbalanced, why, because how were we supposed to know people would use tactical spikes in Free for all to boost? How were we to gather guys would just go grenade spamming with unlimited scavangers? All black ops did was fix what was wrong. A game like MW2, someones gonna do something thats obviously unfair and developers didnt expect. Its trial and error.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
Many forums laugh at the online community of live making quips at the 12 year olds with squeaky voices playing online as if the PS3 is a superior and more mature gaming outlet. You guys do realize that the only reason you hear less of that on ps3 is simply because the MIC isint standard and not everyone cares to buy a separate accessory, but if its a sunk cost, of course you'd use it. In fact, if your the kind who wouldent use it anyways, you prob use it to act stupid simply because its not an important part of your experience. That being said, i have a ps3 and I can tell you I hardly ever hear kids online and its annoying when i do, the ratio of kids on ps3 and 360 is prob the same, ps3 is just a silent community in general.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="deadlyabdus123"]But do games like that need evolution? foxhound_fox
ALL series need evolution. If they don't evolve, they stagnate. And the further along the series is, the more evolution it needs to stay relevant. But CoD has been the same game for every one of its iterations. The series started in 2003 and has had at least 10 different games on multiple platforms... and none of them have been different from one another. What I hate most about the CoD series is what its success is doing to the rest of the industry... making developers just stick to what works and not trying anything new, just to make the most money. It makes me fear for the future of games as art, rather than just a business product.

Overly short campaignsThe worst online community in the history of gaming (maturity-wise)Auto-aim makes it too easy

These are the reasons I don't like it anyway

donalbane
1. Games these days are plagued by short campaigns, at least COD offers action packed every second, even if it gets a tad tedious. 2. Thats what you get for playing on consoles, ps3 has just as many kids as live, but you dont hear them because xbox live has a mic standard, PS3 does not. 3. Try playing it with it off then why dont you? you know you can, but guess what, its much harder. Games shouldent be catered to only us gamers, it should be able to played by anyone. Its one thing to make games easier to suit casuals, its another to make it completely inaccessible.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts

[QUOTE="deadlyabdus123"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

short and long

cause its rehash city,crappy engine,meh gameplay and animations that looked good last gen but now just look horid,robotic and generally reek of rehash.Not to mention an engine older than time itself.

razgriz_101

Isint Fallout: new Vegas more of same, isint, every madden more of the same? Why lose a winning formula, Fallout is boring as hell, im very impatient with it. COD I can pick up and play any time. BF is a better game and much more tactical, doesent make it more fun.

new vegas made massive improvements over FO3

Deeper crafting,not feeling overpowered,better sequel in terms of gameplay but not story it was a good improvement over FO3 despite some parts being disjointed.Trust me if you played new vegas you would know what im meaning its a much much much deeper game in terms of character developement and various other aspects, despite its flaws.

Madden i only buy every 3 years cause i dont bother bout players and unless the change was big enough from one year to the next then i might consider it.Over the past 2 gens i've only bought Madden 2003,2008 and 2011.

BF is way more fun than cod if you find the right people to play with and not a bunch of lone wolf bush wookie tank beasting idiots.

Deeper player enhancements (theatre mode, wager mode), not feeling unbalanced, better n terms of pace but not story and a good improvement over mw2 despite using an older engine. Trust me, if you ever played Black ops, you know what im meaning its a much much much deeper game in terms of multiplayer balance and various other aspects, despite its flaws. See what I did there, New Vegas is not an evolution like Sky Rim is to Oblivion, it is the same old engine tacked on with new features, many gaming sites even express this....
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
If the Wii U offers DX11 + better graphics at 1080p and 60fps and costs less then 300 bucks but doesent offer OMG amazing step up graphics that a next gen leap should. Is it worth getting in the interim to have superior multiplat games if other consoles dont deliver soon enough? My idea is by a Wii U if 2012, and by 2015, sell it and get the next ps4 or whatever, ( I always wait a year after console release so I don't get defective consoles, better games by that time)
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]It is all justified and deserved. Activision isn't doing anything to EVOLVE the series, just keep churning out the same game every year. They are using the same engine from the first game, which was just a modified engine from 1999. :| I don't hate Call of Duty (the first and its expansion are two of my favourite shooters), I just hate what it has become.

But do games like that need evolution? Can the add alot at 60fps? Ever played a sports game where people love the little bits they add and your like, wtf, its the same thing as last time. Same with COD, theatre mode, New perks, Wager mode, ability to choose killstreaks. People who love the fast past twitch (non-tactical gameplay) of COD find much value in it.
Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts

[QUOTE="deadlyabdus123"]Instead of going on a rant like my other post, Ill ask you guys and then counter the argument. I feel all this COD hate going around the gaming community is alienating us from most gamers and fails in logical reasoning and would love to hear your thoughts. razgriz_101

short and long

cause its rehash city,crappy engine,meh gameplay and animations that looked good last gen but now just look horid,robotic and generally reek of rehash.Not to mention an engine older than time itself.

Isint Fallout: new Vegas more of same, isint, every madden more of the same? Why lose a winning formula, Fallout is boring as hell, im very impatient with it. COD I can pick up and play any time. BF is a better game and much more tactical, doesent make it more fun.