decoppel's forum posts

Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="Wassmansdorff"]

I've seen gameplay footages of both games and GT5 looks better without a doubt. Forza 3 has a plastic look on the cars.

Nedemis
comments like this ALWAYS make me laugh. The cars in Forza3 look no more like plastic then the cars in GT5.

Agreed. Honeslty I can find gameplay videos with low res that make Forza look bad, the fact is this videos if not recorded in 1080p or a full stream 100% uncompressed at natural definition look worse when viewed.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="decoppel"][QUOTE="Tekkenloving"]ya the 360 hardware is obviously more powerful but that really does not make the 360 betterTekkenloving
*GPU I think Cevat said the GPU of the 360 allows shading to be rendered faster/better but the Cell allows other things like lighting / physics etc to run better/smoother.

lol im not talking about this specific article their are plenty of examples why the 360 hardware is suprior when a game was not only build for the ps3 for 5 years but had cpu based graphical effects and yet end up running better on 360 it's not hard to see what platform as the better hardware.

I don't really see... what you are talking about... The 360 is easier to dev for and has a better GPU, (assisting the ease) therefore multiplats take less time to perfect versus the PS3, and THEREFORE multiplats look worse.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
@Navyguy In the end, the Cell/weaker GPU was probably a bad combo for Sony, sure it works for first party but most third parts just piss all over it screaming its too difficult. Of course having a more powerful dedicated GPU would make it even easier to dev for, but the fact is while it =/= a GPU itself, it can do more than enough to ensure if properly coded the multicore capabilities grant a little more visual finesse than just the GPU. For the same reason the 360 can produce nicer visuals than its computer graphics card counterpart could, its because game developers fully utilize all cores, as opposed to computer games where its GPU heavy since nobody really knows how many cores you should optimize a game for.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="___gamemaster__"]

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"] I will take the word of a professional, over a SW poster that knows nothing about the subject. It is a fact that they 360 has a better GPU. This has been known for a long time, now. Fanboys have a hard time admitting this, because they don't want to believe that they spent more money on a console that has some weaker hardware than the cheaper console...I'd be upset too.navyguy21

Then, Carmack talked about developing for consoles for the first time with Rage. He feels that the PS3 has more processing power but that the 360 is easier to program for.

Then i guess carmack is lying?!? :D

lol, processing power means jack squat if the GPU cant display it :P. Also, "processing power" is such a general term. The cell.........excells and crunching numbers, or proceessing large amounts of info fast (decoding/encoding movies, data, folding at home) where as in games, it doesnt work that way. So thise "more processing power" means jack when developing games. As i have said before, you can max out crysis on a dual core CPU, and a top of the like GPU, but you will never do that with a quad core CPU, and a low/mid range GPU.

For the record, your logic is partially flawed because of the difference between the Cell and a current gen CPU that we see in computers.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
ya the 360 hardware is obviously more powerful but that really does not make the 360 betterTekkenloving
*GPU I think Cevat said the GPU of the 360 allows shading to be rendered faster/better but the Cell allows other things like lighting / physics etc to run better/smoother.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts

Motion controls need to die.

drufeous
1. QFT 2. If I had to play a game, I think Football would work pretty good... tuck the wand under your arm like a RB and start stiff arming etc.... Or for Natal, hold an RL football for more realism.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
Never heard of it but it actually looks pretty good, I can't wait for Demon's Souls either.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
If it was possible, my yes is still dependant. I would like to see how good of a job it does, on games that actually look stellar for 720p.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
Both consoles GPUs are lower than low end.Brainkiller05
In the grand scheme you hit the nail on the head, the fact is if programmers didn't find their way around GPU limitations neither console would have truely beautiful HD games.
Avatar image for decoppel
decoppel

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 decoppel
Member since 2006 • 61 Posts
I can't seem to recreate the specific images you have, to be completely honest, because the video is not the proper resolution... could you be kind and get a 1080p video clip and recreate them?