[QUOTE="leadernator"] PS3 has the most potential, with the latter end its 1st gen games exceeding anything possible on 360.
360's capabilities tapped out with Gears of War (like the Dreamcast tapped out with Soul Calibur).
PS3's online service is free and pretty much equal to XBL (if not, then better).
With both games and power on its side, there would be no reason NOT to buy a PS3 (if you're a gamer, of course).
The Halo series has lost it.
Screenshot comparisons are worthless, and will evolve to video comparisons.
No one will take the Wii's success seriously, and people would categorize it in the "family entertainment" market.
Everyone will be loved.
mutenpika
1: You wish.
2: Irrational thinking. Implies that devs on 360 suddenly get brain freeze and assumes that no progression is ever made again.
3: Seems unlikely. A server-based thing like that can't do stuff to the magnitude of XBL and remain free for too long. PSN, IMO, will most likely stay where it's at (plus Home), in its perfectly decent and serviceable state. I have no problems with that, actually: I do like PSN.
4: This statement assumes that the rest of the above statements are proven facts. They are not.
5: Bungie slips up for the first time ever, especially with how goshdarned fun that demo was? In that case, I'm calling it now: Starcraft 2 6.4. It's quite probable, by your logic.
6: Youtube is on the verge of breaking the internet already. As much as I would love streaming, embeddable HD quality low-compression videos for comparison, it's probably not going to happen that soon. Screenshots can be posted on a message board and viewed by everybody, so they're still the most convenient.
7: Already being proven wrong. The Wii's success has been built on the casual family market, true, but the same was with the PS2. Did the PS2 have problems with that? No, not really.
whoa. mass ownage. sorry TC you just go whipped.
Log in to comment