deu5ka175's forum posts
I am assuming you are asking which is more important and the only answer is fun. Does not matter how mature it is, scary it is, how good it looks, the tech behind it.....If you are not having fun playing it then it is not any good.
I got a gaming rig. At first I was really excited and loved the graphic advancements but after a while it started wearing thin. I would play on my 360 or PS3 or play at a friends house and I would not notice the graphic downgrades. Why? It wasn't important. Now I have a nice PC I only use for pictures, music, storing info, and it is hardly ever used to play games. So not only did I waste my money on it I have to watch my wife and friends shake their head every time they see it or I bring it up. Stupid purchase. I fell like an idiot for getting it.
Well the PC should destroy both since the machines have decade old hardware. Bringing up PC is just as silly. Especially when the PC was not part of the thread in the first place.The PC version destroys both. Arguing between the PS3 and 360 versions is silly.
arkephonic
ShadowMoses900's blog....:lol: Are you serious?
4Dec 11
Why I am leaving SW.....
You may have noticed that I haven't been posting topics lately, I'll explain why. System Wars has always been a pretty dumb place by it'self, mostly just fanboys trying to one up other fanboys, wether it be 360/PS3/Nintendo/PC it's all pretty stupid. The main reason why I gotinto SW in the first place was because no one really hangs out in General Game Discussions, I would like to simply talk to other gamers but SW is the only place where the activity is. Some times I find the content in SW to be hilarious, and sometimes I would make joke topics about systems because I thought it would be funny, to put it in other words I was trolling. It wasn't serious though and it was pretty obvious that I wasn't to be taken seriously, but lately I notice now with the new change of rules on here (I like it better but it has it's downsides) that many of these posters in SW are really angry and rude fanboys. Now I'm not sensitive or anything like that so I just try to ignore them, but there are so many of them on here now that I find it hard to just ignore them, and when I start trying to respond to them I get in a "fanboy mood" because they are kind of rubbing off on me. I'm not angry at anyone, just that they way they act has some kind of influence on everyone here. And many of these people are not joke trolls, they are serious.
One thing that makes me shake my head and annoys me are all the constant "Skyrim sucks on PS3 because some site says so" threads that popping up. Now I know from my own personal experince with the game on PS3 that it's fine, I have an 11MB save file with over 40 hours in it, I did have a main quest bug (as I mentioned in an older blog post) but the recent update fixed it. I never had any massive framerate drops or anything of the sort, so what get's me annoyed is when alot of these people (mostly 360 fanboys in this case) go on about how it's "unplayable" or it's "a mess" or a "disaster" because a site like Digital Foundry (a 360 bias site) says so. I always try to defend the PS3 version because I know that the problems that this site is mentioning are either made up or over exaggerated, take for instance they recently got caught falsley accusing the PS3 udpadte of Skyrim that it made the graphics worse, it turned out to be BS and they later pulled it. The PS3 version did have some issues no doubt just like the other versions I'm sure, but the site DF only chooses to point out the PS3 and over exaggerate them greatly because it pleases their audience..... BLAH BLAH BLAH....AND SO ON AND SO ON!!!!
Take care!
Man you are a trip.
You can see how bored I was with the PS3. I don't miss it at all. http://psnprofiles.com/iTRAGICKnow what's really lulzy? How PS3 fanboys hide behind exclusives yet they don't buy them and when they do, they hardly play them.
See: ShadowMoses33
http://psnprofiles.com/ShadowMoses33
dj_pulserfan
Well I guess shadowmoses900 has no nerve. Not saying I am surprised. Pretty obvious with his dumb commrnents he is only here to troll and be annoying. I must say I have never seen anyone in such denial. I can't believe you let games get you so worked up guy. Quite pathetic.
I suggest you go to Lens Of Truth, Digital Foundry and go watch some real comparison videos. You make yourself look Like an idiot in here. It is funny but at the same time it is prety sad.
Crysis 2 and Skyrim are the same on both systems.....:lol: I am still laughing about that.
Waiting Mr.Shadowmoses900.
My pic is ready to post. Time for me to do this board a favor. I am dead serious.
How many years have you been denying this? Just recently I have played the new NCAA, Crysis 2, Rage, Orange Box, shift 2, and all the Dirt games on the 360 and I am sorry to say but the PS3 versions were not as good and in some cases like Orange Box, Rage, Shift 2, and Dirt 2, the PS3 versions looked worse instantly. Also NCAA on the PS3 was so full of jaggies we had to mess with the TV settings.[QUOTE="deu5ka175"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/post_msg.php?topic_id=29264834"e_msg_id=337954802
Aside a few rare exceptions, all multiplats are identical on both systems. I don't know why people say otherwise, they know it's the truth.
ShadowMoses900
You do not own a PS3.
And all those games you listed are identical on both consoles. Here you can see for yourself:
Crysis 2: PS3 vs Xbox 360 vs PC - IGN (HD)
Rage: Xbox 360 vs PS3 vs PC Graphics-IGN (HD)
The Orange Box - PS3 Vs. 360
Shift 2 - PS3 VS XBOX 360
DiRT 360 vs PS3 Comparison HD
Only game I could not find was NCAA, The Orange Box video is low res so not reliable, but I have played both versions and they are the same. Only difference is 360 has achievements and PS3 has no trophies on it.
If you say you see a difference in any of these games, your lying.
They really need to kill this thing off. Just put out a public apology and take the heat for a while. At least you will not bleed any more money. What a disaster.
Log in to comment