@jergernice1: Comcast does suck. You need a new provider quickly. As far the X is concerned I see your point on it. It's the most powerful system right now and it'll with a good 4K/HDR tv the games will shine. I need to see more games being native 4K and not upscaled. So far only MS games are native 4K. The Pro isn't a slouch an checker boarding by no means even though the X is better. The S is serviceable but the Pro is a good machine with it's exclusives and 3rd party support
@elmarine2064: Xbox One S will upscale games to a 4K resolution as well as supporting 4K video playback, Xbox marketing exec Aaron Greenberg has confirmed.
@jergernice1: The S upscales games to 4K such as the Pro and plays games in HDR. The X only plays MS games in true 4K/HDR but it also upscales games including 3rd party games to 4K with a slightly sharper image than the Pro. The X doesn't play every single game in native 4K. And if it does it is usually at 30FPS. Second, my Vizio P the shitty TV ranked in the top 5 of everything in a TV. It fell short of OLED TVs. Second, all broadcast TV mostly is in 1080p not 720p here in the US. Only real old shows show in 720p. I know what 4K looks like. I watch my movies in 4K plus some some shows on Netflix. I game in true 4K at times. It is beautiful but that's not enough for ME to buy an X. Only for better graphics. X still has all the components and shortcomings of the OG and S systems. Loading times are horrible. My friend has an X he likes it and I have nothing against it. i will eventually get one but why now if I mostly play only Pro. When MS gives me some exclusives I want to play I will be picking one up.
@ballashotcaller: That's fine if you prefer the X. I do not see a reason to upgrade my S for an X. Dolby Atmos ok. If I had the OG X1 then I would upgrade to the X. The Pro suffices and it does it jobs. It plays my games in 4k and in HDR. The X is powerful and it's good for people heavy in MS system. I will get one once MS puts more effort into software rather than hardware. Sony has the "weaker" system but their library is huge and worth the price of the system.
@awp69: I have both as well but I game more on my Pro for exclusives and multiplats. I wanted an X but my S suffice and does the job as well. Even though the S or Pro is not in the league with the X as far as power those systems are gorgeous on my Vizio P 4k/HDR tv. I will wait till MS can give more than an upgrade in graphics a reason to purchase an X over my S. Pro is my system of choice though, then my Switch
I love the specs of the X. However, I don't see a lot to upgrade from my S. MS should have skipped the S and went straight to the X. I still get upscaled 4K and HDR from my S through my Vizio P 4k/hdr TV. Plus, I have a Pro and it's main console this generation along with my Switch. My games on my Pro look gorgeous as well.
@gleencross: You really can't stand Snyder. I think they should let Geoff Johns write and other DC writers and let Whedon direct or even go back to Nolan
@gleencross: Lol...Snyder is not the main problem. He didn't cut BvS down. It was WB. WB is the main problem for DC failures. Nolan had complete control of his "Batman" and they were successful. The anime cartoons are left in the hands of the director and writers not the WB. the WB needs to have a hands off approach and let the directors and writers do what they do. No need to try to compete with Marvel. Their heroes are different from DC and they had a plan. WB didn't. All this is being thrown together on the fly. The success of WW is what needs to be followed and Snyder who wrote WW with Geoff Johns. You let Johns handle DC and it'll be fine
dhaynes25's comments