[QUOTE="eikast"]
Save some more money and get an E8500.
Get rid of the glasses and get the Arctic cooler pro 7.
Also if you can, try to get the CM 932 HAF Case. I just got mine today and I must say, it was worth the 150 dollars :D
Slig0
I totally disagree. E8500 is only a higher clocked E8400. That is like buying an I7 950 over 920 for 0.4 clock difference that "justifies" $200 price difference. So, save money and get a decent PII or an I7, and of course a better graphics card like GTX260.
There is not a 200 dollar difference. Not even the E8400 to E8600 is a 200 dolalr price difference.
E8400 is 167.99
E8500 is 189.99
E8600 is 269.99
E8600 is not worth it unless you have a lot of money and don't mind upgrading when the time comes when more games make use of quad core, but when that time comes current CPU will not be that great. Also keep in mind there are very few PC exclusive games, even the new crysis game is going to be released on consoles.
Quad is okay for gaming, and would be worth it if the motherboard/ram wasn't so expensive. I have an E8500 @ 400*9.5 (E8400 has its multiplier locked at 9.0) and I have had no trouble with games. I have a HD4870 512 so I wasn't able to push the graphics on GTA because of the locked graphic settings. (I only tried it around the time it was released for the PC)
In my opinion the 20 dollars is worth the extra .5 multiplier. The difference is if you set the FSB to 400mhz would be 3.8ghz vs 3.6 ghz.
Log in to comment