fartwrangler's forum posts

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]You claimed he was comparing American troops to Japanese troops. He was actually comparing American troops to Japanese civilians. Sorry, kiddo.airshocker

No...I said Japanese. I didn't say Japanese troops. And I do value American troops more than Japanese, whether they be soldiers or not.

The syntactical implication being that the comparison was between troops. Now - on what basis do you value American troops more than Japanese civilians?
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Ethics are subjective.....LJS9502_basic

You're a catholic. What the hell.

I don't think I've mentioned my faith in the time you've posted here....at least not with this account name of yours.

Which does not conclude the question of whether you are a) lying, in order to make your life easier in this thread or b) quite happy to disregard the Church wherever you feel like it. Pick one.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]

Then you misread it.

airshocker

No, I didn't.

Nothing about what he said was hateful. I value American troops over Japanese. And I'm certainly not a xenophobe or a racist.

You claimed he was comparing American troops to Japanese troops. He was actually comparing American troops to Japanese civilians. Sorry, kiddo.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]Irrelevant; the classification of the killings under law does not affect their ethical justfiability.airshocker

It's needs no justification from anybody but the United States government and it already has been, for many years. It was a sanctioned war. It wasn't murder. Mass-killing would be more appropriate.

itt the US government is infallible, apparently.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

Ethics are subjective.....LJS9502_basic
You're a catholic. What the hell.

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] It means he values his countries people over other nations at war with them.LJS9502_basic

Considering enemy countries' innocents near-worthless makes him a xenophobe.

No it doesn't. It means he values the lives of his soldiers more than the civilians of an enemy. Anything else....you are reading into it...but it's not what he said.

And if we consider the question of why he holds innocent civilians in such low regard - what do you think the answer to that might be? I'm sure if I said that I valued a white man more than 200,000 black men, I'd be decried as a racist, and quite rightly. So why, when nationality, is the discriminating factor, is there no shortage of jingiostic fools queueing up to justify his xenophobia? Justifications from it being wartime are of course not reasonable, since they were civilians, not soldiers.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]Considering enemy countries' innocents near-worthless makes him a xenophobe.airshocker

All I took from his post was that he values American troops more than Japanese. I didn't see any hate or fear in there.

Then you misread it.

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]Ah yes, I forgot that mass murder was fine when people forgive you afterwards.airshocker

It's not murder when it's a war sanctioned by your country.

Irrelevant; the classification of the killings under law does not affect their ethical justfiability.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts
[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That does not make him racist.....LJS9502_basic

*snort* Xenophobic, if you must.

It means he values his countries people over other nations at war with them.

Considering enemy countries' innocents near-worthless makes him a xenophobe.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]Doesn't make it right.airshocker

Debatable.

It happened, though, and last time I checked the Japanese didn't hate us too much for it. I really don't think I would have gotten the girls I did while over there if they did.

Ah yes, I forgot that mass murder was fine when people forgive you afterwards.