fartwrangler's forum posts

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="taj7575"]

Actually like I said, they took care of Manchuria very quickly, which Japan defended very well.

And Russians were like an infinite number of soldiers at the time. Stalin ignored the deaths and worried more about progress, so they wouldv'e taken care of Japan easily.By the end of WWII, Soviet military casualties were ~8-10 million, which tells you that Stalin was less than worried about loosing soldiers.

And the soldiers were brutal, so like I said, most likely more Japanese casualties.

But Japan should be happy it's not the Soviets who were left to "rebuild" their country.

airshocker

Either way, it was a quick way to end the war and we took it. No remorse.

Doesn't make it right. 'quick' it might have been, but it was still the unnecessary murder of 150,000 civilians.

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"]

[QUOTE="mr_poodles123"] This

And quite simply, I value an American soldier's life more than 200,000 Japanese civilians.

LJS9502_basic

Weren't you the one spouting the 'support our troops' crap in that other thread? I should've predicted you'd be a racist.

That does not make him racist.....

*snort* Xenophobic, if you must.

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]If the Japanese back then had nukes, they wouldn't think twice about using them on us. mr_poodles123

This

And quite simply, I value an American soldier's life more than 200,000 Japanese civilians.

Weren't you the one spouting the 'support our troops' crap in that other thread? I should've predicted you'd be a racist.

Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"][QUOTE="VisigothSaxon"]

Well the point of a government is restriction, but the US government restricts less and stays away from civil liberties, while socialism and communism have almost no boundaries. Get it?

VisigothSaxon

Bull****. Presumably for you, socialism and communism all blur into one big, red, Leninist blur. :roll:

GAH, do I really have to seperate everything for you, I am talking in generalities, sure both of them are entirely different, but still kind of have the same outline.

None of which necessarily prohibits free speech. Not that I expect someone whose entire conception of socialism is derived from the USSR to appreciate that.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"][QUOTE="VisigothSaxon"]I am not, I am just saying these forms of government apply restrictionsVisigothSaxon

As does pretty much every form of government in the world, USA included. Presumably the USA has been on a precipitous slide into dictatorship for a long time now?

Well the point of a government is restriction, but the US government restricts less and stays away from civil liberties, while socialism and communism have almost no boundaries. Get it?

Bull****. Presumably for you, socialism and communism all blur into one big, red, Leninist blur. :roll:
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"][QUOTE="VisigothSaxon"]

Ya, but they are probably communist or socialist. So you still aren't understanding me, answer the question or I am done talking to you.

VisigothSaxon

Irrelevant. You posited a direct causal link between them, not just a mere correlation. Oh, and nice job expanding 'dictatorship' to 'dictatorship, socialism and communism' in a desperate bid to shore up your case.

Do you not see the link between them? Surely you can see these 3 forms of governemnt lack free speech in varying degrees? I am done talking to you btw, your argument is void since you refused to answer my question, after I provided evidence time and time again.

You provided zero evidence. Literally; none. Your question was irrelevant. You couldn't keep your argument consistent. And now you're falsely dichotomising socialism and freedom of speech. You've consistently argued with all the prowess of a ten-year-old and showed a total lack of understanding of logical fallacy and of political theory. I'm the one who should be refusing to talk to you, not the other way round.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts
I am not, I am just saying these forms of government apply restrictionsVisigothSaxon
As does pretty much every form of government in the world, USA included. Presumably the USA has been on a precipitous slide into dictatorship for a long time now?
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="fartwrangler"][QUOTE="VisigothSaxon"]

Look at any nations history, where the Government turns into either socialism, communism, or a dictator ship, you will find that freedoms are taken away including freedom of speech. One example of a place that had freedom of speech taken away was Communist Russia.

VisigothSaxon

This doesn't prove that the lack of free speech is responsible for the form of government. Plenty of countries have long prohibited inciting violence and are not dictatorships.

Ya, but they are probably communist or socialist. So you still aren't understanding me, answer the question or I am done talking to you.

Irrelevant. You posited a direct causal link between them, not just a mere correlation. Oh, and nice job expanding 'dictatorship' to 'dictatorship, socialism and communism' in a desperate bid to shore up your case.
Avatar image for fartwrangler
fartwrangler

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 fartwrangler
Member since 2010 • 86 Posts
[QUOTE="yesterdayaugust"][QUOTE="Intoolectual"]

Especially when they don't understand what they're talking about.

Any body else feel this way?

Any soldiers on Gamespot?

mr_poodles123
i appreciate that you actually care about us...i may not be deployed but i am a cop in the air force and currently i have the privilege of defending our nukes. i have a buddy of mine who has been in iraq just over a week now,he wont be back till february. where im stationed at a lot of the "local's" dont really give us respect or a simple thank you,most of them just give dirty looks and what not.the only time i get a handshake or a thank you is when im home on leave back in jersey. just want to say thanks for your support.

Thank you for your service sir. People that don't support the troops, no matter what war they are fighting should go die in a hole.

itt jingoistic fools embarrass themselves by bellowing at people who aren't as blindly irrational as they are.