The Pope Quotes a 14 th century emperor and all hell breaks loose. I guess you have to be blind not to see what is going on here. The Pope is not allowed free speech to quote another, but radical Islamic Fascist are give free range to demand the Pope be hunted down and killed. To make it even worse, the proof that the left wing bias media is anti Christianity and sympathetic to the anti west, not anti any other religion, is out there in big print. Yet it is not as obvious the the masses. The radical Islamic Fascist are open about their intent of taking over the world in the name of religion, still no word condemning them from the liberal media.

Instead you have the higher intellect of the entertainment world...

Rosie O'Donnell: "Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam"

I can't remember the last time Christians beheaded the "non believer". I don't even hear anything about that either. When was the last time you heard the left wing liberal media or any politician condemn the beheading of Americans? I do hear the libs cry and pound their fist over a captured terrorist having to listen to loud rap music. They get their own personal nightclub and the libs cry torture. Beheading though gets no outcry. What about the Geneva convention? The libs demand they get our Constitutional rights but civilians beheaded in Iraq get nothing, not even a head. Thank you libs for doing your best to destroy our country.

OK so I freaked out and got the new Lego game for the 360, it better be good. I was just checking out what was new and saw this. It did not get the best rating but everybody is saying that it is mad fun. Well I hope so, but just in case I pre ordered Gears of War, FEAR, and Call of Duty 3, and they are all paid off. The Lego game is in 1080 hd so I am sure I will be digging that. So when I get off work today I will jump on it.

After all the complaining about the gas prices and all the yapping about "BIG OIL" the gas prices fall, where is the good news? This is just another example of the left and the media being ignorant. I know nothing is new here I would like to remind some of you what news is. We will hear how we are going to run out of oil, and there is plenty in our country. We will hear about the profits the oil companies make, from buying oil from other countries, while not being able to use what we have. We will hear about how we rape the resources of other countries for our benefit, and not allowed to use ours. Then we hear how it is Bushes fault that the prices are so high. He is helping his big oil buddies become rich, like they aren't already. This type of stuff gets repeated over and over in the news. It becomes embedded in your head and it is "common knowledge" thanks to the repetition. I know you guys and girls are happy now that the prices have fallen, and will continue to do so, but what have you heard. I am willing to bet you are not hearing anything, or conspiracy. They are like the weatherman when it comes to positive news. If it rains the weatherman will tell you it is raining, and it takes a professional to look out their window to see that. Same with the gas prices. I also know that you will hear about Bush lowering the prices of gas to win votes for the republicans. This is typical of the media and the left wing. Everything bad, no matter what it is, is the fault of the republicans. How about global warming, high gas prices, terrorism, poor people, inequality, suffering, poor economy, job loss. The only thing is this stuff never ends or gets better, until the libs get control. That is amazing! I don't remember a terrorist attack since 911 in this country. I know it cost less to fill up my gas tank, I know the economy is great and the jobless rate is under 5%. I know that the hurricane season is very slow. Ask yourself this libs. If Canada is one of our largest suppliers of oil, why do they pay more than we do for gas? If global bs is so bad thanks to us, where are are the devastating hurricanes? If there is so much suffering in our country, then why are we better off than the rest of the world? The best one of all is WHY is all the complaining coming from the liberal run cities and states? In VA we are considered a republican state. Yet the city of Richmond is run by libs and it is the worst area to live in. The city of Richmond is where all the suffering is and the libs have not been able to fix it. It reminds me of the change in New York, who cleaned that up, not you liberals?

I just checked the forums and just noticed how every little baby out there will dismiss everything that they cant talk around. I just don't have the energy today to babysit. The one in particular is the word natural. Today natural and traditional are "hate speech" which in liberal terms means a road block to the destruction of God and America. I find it interesting that so many of these intellectuals pass these issues off as things of the past, they are irrelevant to today. Thats the same thing libs say about history. So nothing really matters except complaining about humanity. It is surprising how much they strive to befriend the radical Islamic fascist, the label that was not coined by Bush, yet they cant befriend everyday Americans that have morals. Morals, tradition, natural, these thing do not belong because they create "hate".  Hate is there favorite words and it is what they hide behind trying to blind others of theirs. Have you read "Brave New World"? This is a great book that describes liberalism and what direction it is going. People are created because of the biology that men and woman possess. These are thing that God has given us. This is another thing that libs are terrified of, God. They try their best to donate that authority to the government. So now if they can give the natural God given abilities to the government to own they can destroy God, tradition, and the nature of life. This is a little of what I am hearing out their in the intellectual liberal forums. Throw out the "natural" argument it is irrelevant, and the reason they give is artificial insemination. They would love to make sex a sport rather than a way to create life. It is so unfair because some people cant have kids naturally. There you go nature is not fair naturally and the government can make it fair. Gay people cant have kids through sex with a partner of the same sex and that is not fair. Wow nature is not fair again. We need to ban this nature thing before it gets out of hand. Libs are after a "Brave New World" where the government can make us all programmable to act fair and just, nature will be a folklore along with tradition, and God will no longer be necessary anymore because we have figured out how to do his job for Him, and do what He wont, make it fair for all.

I just got my new tv! I am so excited. It is great, I set my XBOX 360 up and played Burnout, it is out of control. It is a Samsung 46" flat HD lcd 1080. I cant tell you how amazing it is. I was so excited I woke up at 7 am and watched my first movie on it, United 93. Next on the list is Condemned on the 360, lights out and surround sound blasting. Insane is all I can say. Thank you Jesus.

HailEnki , has made a prediction, and I believe it is a valid one considering the way these polititions play politics. So let keep and ears open and give the left credit.... if they actually deserve it.

HERE IT IS....

Sep 6, 2006 5:57 pm ET You forgot a choice on your poll and that is "Meh he's just getting teh terrorist talk out their to help his base in the upcoming election"

No election in two months = none of this would be

I'm going to go on record stating that THEIR WILL be another claimed dangerous terrorist threat of a possible attack on the USA before the election as Bush has time and time again claimed coming terrorist threats to help him and his part out politically.

Finally the house is gone, out of my hands and left me with $56k cash in hand. Time for the new tv. Of course I will reinvest but I am getting myself a birthday present. I would like to thank God for being there for me the entire time. Now I can pay my bills.

Tell me I am paranoid, go for yourself man. I tell you right now I have been on this union and it is a good one, but there is some anti opinion policing going on. I was surprised to see the amount of immaturity from the officers of these boards. It has come down to the point of defending childish remarks of friends of the "correct" opinion. What is going on is lots of childish "counter points", so when you come back at them with some of the same that illustrates the pettiness, beware it is only for the libs, socialist, and commies, they start acting like a preschooler and tell you "this is my game so I get to go first." Whoa! little johnny I will let you go first OK, I will even let you win if it makes you happy. I am learning a lot on how to raise children at least.

This is typical of the pinkos all over. They love to push around the little guy while claiming equal rights and compassion. Well here on Game spot we have the same problem. I find it so fascinating how the violations get tossed around from the mods with a view point to those they disagree with. I read a forum board when the mod was allowed to "flame-bait" and disguise bad language and then mod the person he was baiting. Sound like the democratic party? If you answer no, it is because you are a lib and you apply the double standard to yourself, so kiss off or get a clue. Well the first incident I had with this was using the word freak, which is how I describe myself in my profile. Well according to the "thought police", thanks Tammy Bruce for the great label, I was being mean to people calling them a freak. All the while I am being called a bigot, racist, homophobe. Now I don't mind being called names and I can fly off the handle too, but I will make amends for my behavior. To top it off you have these people who will trash you while you are on suspension. Hey thats life, right? It is great entertainment, these libs, but the political correctness and double standards with these people in "power" sure put a dent on ideas being discussed.

Whats new? A devastating story of Bush and his evil administration trying to destroy a innocent "human" being. Remember Valerie Plame? How could you forget if you watch the news? She was the CIA "secret" agent who was exposed by "Scooter" Libby. You know, the one who sent her husband to Africa to debunk the evidence that Saddam tried to buy uranium. Well Joe Wilson decided to sue "Scooter" Libby for the leak that he was responsible for. Of course this is nothing new for libs, or should I say the "superior" ones. Well I am curious how many people will actually get the truth about the matter considering the media, with no agenda of course, will not spend much time correcting their mistakes. Is their a new definition for news that I am not aware of, like marriage. I really thought that news was about reporting facts to inform the public about what is going on in the world. I am sure I am wrong now. Lets look at the article and a few clues to the mindset of the LEFT!

"WE'RE RELUCTANT to return to the subject of former CIA employee Valerie Plame because of our oft-stated belief that far too much attention and debate in Washington has been devoted to her story and that of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, over the past three years. "

Wow in the first sentence they tell you they are reluctant to go back to the story, do you think that since for three years they have been reporting a lie, might be a factor. What does the truth tell you? The media has a agenda. The truth is not that important to them is it?

Last sentence,

" It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously."

That is a funny way to say, "It's unfortunate that so many people took US seriously. They were the ones that took him so seriously that they reported on the lie of it all for three years.

End of an Affair

It turns out that the person who exposed CIA agent Valerie Plame was not out to punish her husband.

Friday, September 1, 2006; Page A20

WE'RE RELUCTANT to return to the subject of former CIA employee Valerie Plame because of our oft-stated belief that far too much attention and debate in Washington has been devoted to her story and that of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, over the past three years. But all those who have opined on this affair ought to take note of the not-so-surprising disclosure that the primary source of the newspaper column in which Ms. Plame's cover as an agent was purportedly blown in 2003 was former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage.

Mr. Armitage was one of the Bush administration officials who supported the invasion of Iraq only reluctantly. He was a political rival of the White House and Pentagon officials who championed the war and whom Mr. Wilson accused of twisting intelligence about Iraq and then plotting to destroy him. Unaware that Ms. Plame's identity was classified information, Mr. Armitage reportedly passed it along to columnist Robert D. Novak "in an offhand manner, virtually as gossip," according to a story this week by the Post's R. Jeffrey

Smith, who quoted a former colleague of Mr. Armitage.

It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- is untrue. The partisan clamor that followed the raising of that allegation by Mr. Wilson in the summer of 2003 led to the appointment of a special prosecutor, a costly and prolonged investigation, and the indictment of Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, on charges of perjury. All of that might have been avoided had Mr. Armitage's identity been known three years ago.

That's not to say that Mr. Libby and other White House officials are blameless. As prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has reported, when Mr. Wilson charged that intelligence about Iraq had been twisted to make a case for war, Mr. Libby and Mr. Cheney reacted by inquiring about Ms. Plame's role in recommending Mr. Wilson for a CIA-sponsored trip to Niger, where he investigated reports that Iraq had sought to purchase uranium. Mr. Libby then allegedly disclosed Ms. Plame's identity to journalists and lied to a grand jury when he said he had learned of her identity from one of those reporters. Mr. Libby and his boss, Mr. Cheney, were trying to discredit Mr. Wilson; if Mr. Fitzgerald's account is correct, they were careless about handling information that was classified.

Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.

You people..... How could you take the news so seriously?