The problem when people comparing "looks" is that it's very subjective to lots of factors, taste, resolution, live-render vs pre-rendered monitor displayed, resolution, particular angle/scene etc.

This clips is from a closed presentation for the press at a Games Fair Show and might be the closest you can get to see how Star Citizen really looks like without having it.

Source

original pic: https://cdn2.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/001/525/006/large/omar-aweidah-gamestar-cover-05.jpg

Bonus

Still winning

Easily

@casharmy not even close, what you don't seem to understand is that Star Citizen is a work in progress, you will find multitudes of different asset's spread across the web, some look better than others, but they will always be technologically superior to anything made for consoles.

These were taken with a 2013 gaming pc (i5, gtx660)

Ok guys cut the bullshit, Star Citizen is a game made for 2017 Hardware, it will run @4k and @8k Resolution's without any blurriness for the next 10 years. The game is made from the ground up to use the UHD textures and the number of polygons in every basic item is higher than anything else used in the industry, you can't and shouldn't compare with a console game, it's unfair and plain dumb.

4k Album: - http://imgur.com/gallery/rwt2Y

How could you miss Tony Zurovec? Creator and mastermind of the Crusader series!

No Remorse & No Regret!

Underrated classics!

Both ARMA and Star Citizen have fully integrated First Person View & 3rd Person View. What you do is what your character is really doing in that very moment. Actualy Star Citizen is taking it a bit further because it´s also modelling jaw/teeth/thong for speech and eyeballs for eye movement.

Dark Souls is not depressing but it is very humbling. You go play it thinking you know a thing or two about games and then you get the lesson of your life.