Frank_Castle's comments

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Xristophoros: I don’t have a problem with a lighter tone in regards to certain characters. Dark and gritty works for characters like Batman or the Punisher...but it made absolutely no sense for a character like Superman. That’s what guys like Snyder don’t seem to understand. Superman is supposed to be the super idealistic, goody two-shoes Boy Scout. Yet Snyder turned him into this mopey, brooding douchebag who acts like he’d rather be doing anything else than saving people...except for Lois Lane.

I think Justice League should have a lighter tone than stuff like Man of Steel, BvS or Suicide Squad...but it just seems like they’ve gone completely overboard and vaulted to the other extreme.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

How anyone could consider this a good thing is beyond me.

Snyder is a one trick pony and that trick stopped being interesting a long time ago.

This is sure to be a CGI extravaganza (looks more like a videogame than a movie) with excessive lens flare and slow mo shots.

It's also ridiculous how these DC movies have gone from having little to no levity to now going totally overboard and cracking lame-ass jokes every other second, judging by the trailers. And the funniest thing is that the "kiddie" comedy elements that Marvel injects into their movies has been heavily ridiculed by DC fanboys for years. Now they're suddenly all about it for Justice League...lol.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Frank_Castle

@autumnvarela: The Punisher isn’t a superhero, he’s a ruthless vigilante who slaughters criminals. Who the hell wants to see some lighthearted, PG-13 version of Frank Castle? Nobody.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@huehuebrbr: I’m sorry...are the Switch, NES Classic and SNES Classic readily available? No? Thought so. And that’s not because of some crazy ass demand that Nintendo can’t meet. It’s because the goofy assholes running the company are more concerned with having the “hot product” than maximizing profits. Which is a completely ass-backwards business model.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Frank_Castle

Nintendo are still the kings of 1st party titles. It’s just a real shame that they pull this artificial scarcity bullshit with their consoles.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@xavier141524: Quite the opposite. Multiplayer is boring. It consists of running around and doing the same shit repeatedly.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Frank_Castle

Who even cares at this point? The game is over 4 years old and RDR 2 is 6-8 months away from dropping.

RDR smacks the piss out of GTA. Then again, I’m a massive Eastwood/Leone/Van Cleef fan so I admit I have a bias.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Frank_Castle

@blondie_82: This looks more like a videogame than a movie.

These DC flicks are CGI overload. They use it when it isn't even remotely necessary.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@domiddian: Not really. Ridley still knows how to make a movie that is pretty to look at...but that's basically where it ends.