frannkzappa's forum posts

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="Abbeten"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The father of the dead children.

hartsickdiscipl

and you don't see any problem with this at all

I'm not saying that it's "right." I am saying that his actions do represent justice in it's simplest, most immediate form.

Which is why the concept of justice should be quickly forgotten. it shouldn't be up to the common man to decide what is right and wrong.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

Depends how you question morality. Asking why beating someone in the head with a hammer is not ok because it's ok to beat a rock with a hammer is the wrong way to question morality.

InEMplease

Having a conflicting ideology on that subject does not mean someone supports or commits murder. It simply means that they do not believe there is some "higher" law(interpret that as you will) that states the act is fundamentally wrong(whatever that means). Either way there isn't much to worry about because a healthy human should have biological stops that prevent them from (among other things) commiting senseless murder, regardless of their opinion on the matter.

Ah I never spoke of conflicting ideologies, or any kind of higher law. All I'm saying is there's an apporiate way to question such delicate matters. Comparing sentient beings to rocks is not one of them.

well my point was that there are in fact no wrong ways of "questioning" as you put it, as there are no palpable consequences for anyone involved.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

or is it? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?

InEMplease

So what if it's not? "Morality" is a weak and overly grey concept.Can you realy blame someone for questioning it?

Depends how you question morality. Asking why beating someone in the head with a hammer is not ok because it's ok to beat a rock with a hammer is the wrong way to question morality.

Having a conflicting ideology on that subject does not mean someone supports or commits murder. It simply means that they do not believe there is some "higher" law(interpret that as you will) that states the act is fundamentally wrong(whatever that means). Either way there isn't much to worry about because a healthy human should have biological stops that prevent them from (among other things) commiting senseless murder, regardless of their opinion on the matter.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

He has stated multiple times that this was all theoretical.

mrbojangles25

or is it? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?

So what if it's not? "Morality" is a weak and overly grey concept.Can you realy blame someone for questioning it?

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

He has stated multiple times that this was all theoretical.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] He killed the man's sons.....NEWMAHAY
Then the the man murdered him. I feel for the guy, but he still committed murder.

wow, just read your sig... did lai actualy say that?

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="kneeha"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

well the only reason it matters is because you are also a human, and you would prefer not to be hurt, killed...ect. so what do you do? you find a bunch of other people and then you come to an agreement that should someone hurt or kill you, then rest of the group will promise to punish that person.

TheHighWind

So I get most of you guys point, society and all, I'll attack morality and society tommorow, my daughter just came home I got to go play random 4 yr old games..

How nice that you were talking about murder a second ago?

I swear OT creeps me out sometimes.

whats wrong with talking about murder?

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"] I disagree people will follow their moral judgement even when it's inconvenient for them. For example today I didn't lie about my reason for avoiding a meeting when it would have been so easy, but my pesky morality got in the way(j/p I like my morality)kneeha

if you arent "moral" how can you expect others to be?

it's just a complex agreement created by society.

some people live above our societies moral obligations and don't expect other's to do the same how do you account for that?

well then they don't need to be "moral", nothing wrong with that. if it were me i'd try to get in good with those people, hence why i'm a hardcore authoritarian.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"][QUOTE="kneeha"]

Follow my thinking please. A rock is made up of matter, and energy, made by natural processes. If I pick up a hammer, and bust up a rock, no one would call me evil. But, A human is made up of matter, and energy, made by natural processes. If I pick up a hammer and bust a human's head open people would call me evil.

Why is that? If naturalism is true then why is it wrong to kill people... with hammers. lol

The point of this post is to find out what people believe is a natural reason for morality, but focus on the scenario.

kneeha

Rocks aren't alive Don't feel pain Don't have emotion And You're an idiot

I'll be an idiot, cool. Why does it matter if humans feel pain, and have emotion before they die? Why is it wrong? What makes it evil to kill things with emotion or sentience. an interesting counter to that. A mosquito feels pain and as far as we know could have all the emotion in the world but most people swat them with ease.

well the only reason it matters is because you are also a human, and you would prefer not to be hurt, killed...ect. so what do you do? you find a bunch of other people and then you come to an agreement that should someone hurt or kill you, then rest of the group will promise to punish that person.

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

morality is a made up concept created for our own convenience.

kneeha

I disagree people will follow their moral judgement even when it's inconvenient for them. For example today I didn't lie about my reason for avoiding a meeting when it would have been so easy, but my pesky morality got in the way(j/p I like my morality)

if you arent "moral" how can you expect others to be?

it's just a complex agreement created by society.